*I am always especially excited to see a laser based experiment that produces highly reproducible LENR active results. As Peter points out in this thread, these results are described in this experimental series referenced in the paper as follows:*
*http://www.currentscience.ac.in/php/forthcoming/CS-3.pdf <http://www.currentscience.ac.in/php/forthcoming/CS-3.pdf>* *Highly reproducible LENR experiments using dual laser stimulation,* *When light is made to trigger positive LENR results, the LENR mechanism is strictly Nanoplasmonic in nature.* *In 2002, Peter Hagelstein suggested that dual (red) lasers might be effective in triggering excess power if operated in difference mode around 8 and 15 THz.* *I wonder why this theory wasn't developed further when the series of nanoplasmonic experiments showed consistent reproducible results.* *If the nanoplasmonic trail was followed and developed further, if this new field of study in science was not identified and studied further, this shows a serious lack of problem solving technique on the part of leading LENR theorists. * *Its only common sense...when we smell smoke in a house, you go from room to room looking for the source. In scattered brain distraction, we don't decide to take a walk in the woods because its a sunny day.* *Repeatable positive LENR experimental results are so rare and precious, not even one can be ignored, everyone must be doggedly studied, with its theoretical implications correlated relentlessly and tirelessly leading to new experimental tests until the root of LENR causation is found. * *This lack of concentration on positive results is at the root of LENR's theoretical failures. * On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Readers > > It is here: > > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/01/the-time-factor-in-our-universe-and-for.html > > Please excuse or ignore the complaining and focus on the good things! > Peter > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
