Reference: Microbial transmutation of Cs-137 and LENR in growing biological systems
V. I. Vysotskii and A. A. Kornilova There has been a long tradition of detecting LENR activity using changes in the radiation output and change of radioactive isotope half-life in LENR experimentation as an indicator of positive LENR activity over the decades mostly used by Russian LENR researchers. This LENR detection technique is more sensitive and less complicated than the rigmarole that one must go through to show positive LENR activity using excess heat. I suggest that the upcoming MFMP Hot Cat and Piantelli replications add a radioactive tracer to the fuel load so that a safe level of radioactive tracer radiation is detected just outside of the reactor structure. When the level of radiation falls, LENR is active. It has recently been suggested that relativistic time dilatation regarding subatomic particles plays a role in the LENR process. If true, this would lead to a reduction of radiation levels produced by the radioactive isotope tracer when the LENR process is active. This is a tried and true experimental method to detect LENR activity. This LENR detection indicator will be a more sensitive indicator to use in detecting very weak LENR activity than will excess heat detection. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > *I am always especially excited to see a laser based experiment that > produces highly reproducible LENR active results. As Peter points out in > this thread, these results are described in this experimental series > referenced in the paper as follows:* > > > *http://www.currentscience.ac.in/php/forthcoming/CS-3.pdf > <http://www.currentscience.ac.in/php/forthcoming/CS-3.pdf>* > > > *Highly reproducible LENR experiments using dual laser stimulation,* > > > *When light is made to trigger positive LENR results, the LENR mechanism > is strictly Nanoplasmonic in nature.* > > > *In 2002, Peter Hagelstein suggested that dual (red) lasers might be > effective in triggering excess power if operated in difference mode around > 8 and 15 THz.* > > > *I wonder why this theory wasn't developed further when the series of > nanoplasmonic experiments showed consistent reproducible results.* > > > *If the nanoplasmonic trail was followed and developed further, if this > new field of study in science was not identified and studied further, this > shows a serious lack of problem solving technique on the part of leading > LENR theorists. * > > > *Its only common sense...when we smell smoke in a house, you go from > room to room looking for the source. In scattered brain distraction, we > don't decide to take a walk in the woods because its a sunny day.* > > > *Repeatable positive LENR experimental results are so rare and precious, > not even one can be ignored, everyone must be doggedly studied, with its > theoretical implications correlated relentlessly and tirelessly leading to > new experimental tests until the root of LENR causation is found. * > > > *This lack of concentration on positive results is at the root of LENR's > theoretical failures. * > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Dear Readers >> >> It is here: >> >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/01/the-time-factor-in-our-universe-and-for.html >> >> Please excuse or ignore the complaining and focus on the good things! >> Peter >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > >
