Nanomagnetism,superparamagnetism and the DogboneJones--

I think you have it right this time.  Thanks for answering one of my primary 
questions regarding spin energy coupling in LENR, posed when I first 
participated in Vortex, now nearly a year ago.  I will get the book by Baskar 
that you mention. 

There may be related spin coupling to nucleon energy levels with the electronic 
spin/angular momentum/energy transfer of the super paramagnetic oxides that you 
point out.  Such a coupling, if occurring in small enough quanta, could allow 
the large changes in the nuclear mass and energy implied by the changes LENR 
researchers have reported.  

The old engineering technology associated with the development of MRI devices 
and its technology's expressed understanding of nuclear magnetic resonances and 
EM stimulations is pertinent IMHO.  The super paramagnetic properties described 
may even be a chapter in the MIR textbooks focusing on NMR (nuclear magnetic 
resonance).  General Electric and Siemens should have a good handle on this 
issue. 

Thanks,

Bob Cook
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jones Beene 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 9:04 AM
  Subject: [Vo]:Nanomagnetism,superparamagnetism and the Dogbone


   "High Temperature Magnetic Properties of Transition Metal Oxides" by Baskar 
is online at Goggle books. One of the keys to understanding SPP and 
nanomagnetism in the context of the Dogbone (alumina) reactors like the Hot Cat 
is suggested in the information on alumina in this book. This also meshes with 
the prior thread on iron oxides - and the purpose of having these oxides in an 
effective fuel mix.


  It looks like nano-iron-oxide is important for dogbone-type reactors because 
of ferrimagnetic and superparamagnetic properties. A ferrimagnetic material is 
one that has populations of atoms with opposing magnetic moments like 
antiferromagnetism; however, the opposing moments are unequal, they are 
spontaneous, and they are self-oscillating to transfer spin energy. 


  This hypothesis begins in the context of superparamagnetism and 
self-alternating magnetic properties at high temperature. Some physicists have 
overlooked the importance of magnetism at high temperatures because of an 
imprecise understanding of the Curie Point. A proper analysis requires the 
Curie-Weiss Law, which is still in flux. so to speak due to Wannier populations 
and so on. To cut to the chase, there can be extremely intense local magnetic 
fields at 1000C, especially in alumina which is powered by a coil, but these 
fields are localized and dynamic so as to hide their polarity at a distance.

  Alumina is interesting in a magnetic sense, especially at elevated 
temperature. The element aluminum has an unpaired electron in the 3p shell and 
can be strongly paramagnetic. Yet, the oxygen of alumina alters the pairing, 
and above 300C it can be diamagnetic, or more interesting - in a state of 
oscillation. Oxygen has unusual paramagnetic properties in combination with 
many metals. The important detail happens at small dimensions in nanomagnetism, 
as it would apply to SPP and the interaction with dense hydrogen - and that 
detail includes very rapid field reversals, due to the short life of SPPs.

  That is where superparamagnetism comes into play - along with spin-energy 
transfer. Very sharp" localized field reversal" is a descriptor of 
superparamagnetism and also of SPP, and also of a route to thermal overunity.  
I have a strong suspicion that the key to the thermal anomaly in many dogbone 
experiments involves magnetic field oscillation, instead of nuclear reactions.  
How this translates into thermal gain is relatively easy to imagine - the 
common example being the electrical transformer reduced to the nanoscale.

  In sufficiently small nanoparticles, ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic 
magnetization of the particles will flip direction and oscillate under the 
influence of temperature. The heating is induction - exactly like a solenoid 
core. The typical time between two flips is called the Néel relaxation time 
(typically below 1 nano-sec). 

  The larger problem is "where does anomalous heat come from?" Is it nuclear? 
An answer is that anomalous heat comes from spin coupling and rapid magnetic 
field oscillation which employs protons as the real fuel.  Conservation of 
angular momentum or of spin quantum number tend to mask the fact that spin 
energy can transfer in a way similar to heat, and even be masked by heat.

  The ultimate source of excess heat in the dogbone is less clear - but is 
thought to be mass/energy conversion of a tiny  percentage of proton mass into 
energy. Proton mass is an average, is not quantized, and about half of it is 
spin energy. Tens of keV can be transferred with not apparent change to the 
hydrogen population.

  Protons supply spin energy via QCD at one level and via "magnons" (which are 
descriptive of spin transfer) on a larger level. Magnons are the  final piece 
of the puzzle, since they transfer mass-energy in larger chunks via "spin  
waves" whenever color-charge is altered (which is often in confined systems 
containing protons).

  We are almost to a level of understanding, if new data confirms the role of 
SPP. A useful theory  - full of predictive power - is now emerging under the 
banner of nanomagnetism, but at its core is the SPP phenomenon. 

  Among the most important predictions (for further development of the dogbone 
reactor) - is that excess visible light emission (in the form of abnormal 
incandescence) will track with thermal gain BUT this will also render IR 
thermometry useless.  And correspondingly, using visible light intensity will 
streamline  the search for added gain, since a luxmeter is much simpler, faster 
and more reliable than a calorimeter.

  Jones

Reply via email to