Robin--
I agree. I was kidding Jones about worrying about the Li-6 availability.
"He should invert".
Note that one site could supply all the worlds needs for hundreds of years.
Li-6 supply should not be an issue.
However I do believe that if Li-6 is the active ingredient as Jones
suggests, then its concentration in small amounts--nano sized amounts--makes
sense for a well engineered fuel with high thermal integrity.\
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainly about "classic LENR" at ICCF-19
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:46:06 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Jones--
Maybe its time to invest in the natural Li deposits (which contain Li-6) in
South America or in the US. See the various raw Li brine deposits with a
potential new play in Wyoming. It's is said the Wyoming deposit could
contain 18 million tons of Li--enough to supply the world for hundreds of
years. I suspect that if Li-6 for LENR catches on, there will be lots of
Li prospecting happening. Processing Li-6 for production of nano particles
for incorporation into a robust matrix of a LENR long-lived reactor may be
where the action is.
Bob
Not much point. There is enough Lithium in seawater to make it attractive as
an
energy source, especially if it can be extracted efficiently using
ion-exchange
techniques. The concentration in ordinary rock/soil is even higher.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
