To JONES BEENE!

Dear Jones,

Please allow me to publish on Ego Out your comment re Pd vs Noveau LENR.\

Thanks
Peter

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote:

> Robin--
>
> I agree.  I was kidding Jones about worrying about the Li-6 availability.
> "He should invert".
>
> Note that one site could supply all the worlds needs for hundreds of
> years. Li-6 supply should not be an issue.
>
> However I do believe that if Li-6 is the active ingredient as Jones
> suggests, then its concentration in small amounts--nano sized
> amounts--makes sense for a well engineered fuel with high thermal
> integrity.\
>
> Bob
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 6:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainly about "classic LENR" at ICCF-19
>
>
>
> In reply to  Bob Cook's message of Sun, 29 Mar 2015 13:46:06 -0700:
> Hi,
> [snip]
>
>> Jones--
>>
>> Maybe its time to invest in the natural Li deposits (which contain Li-6)
>> in South America or in the US.  See the various raw Li brine deposits with
>> a potential new play in Wyoming.  It's is said the Wyoming deposit could
>> contain 18 million tons of Li--enough to supply the world for hundreds of
>> years.  I suspect that if Li-6 for LENR catches on, there will be lots of
>> Li prospecting happening.  Processing Li-6 for production of nano particles
>> for incorporation into a robust matrix of a LENR long-lived reactor may be
>> where the action is.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>
> Not much point. There is enough Lithium in seawater to make it attractive
> as an
> energy source, especially if it can be extracted efficiently using
> ion-exchange
> techniques. The concentration in ordinary rock/soil is even higher.
> Regards,
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to