Frank-

I listened to an interview you gave, I believe in 2012.  I understand better 
where you are coming from.

I agree that the use of iron can increase the local magnetic fields.  I do not 
understand why you suggest the local magnetic fields induced by the iron would 
not change the local field that nucleons experience.  I would say they would.  
The local magnetic field in a NMR machine does affect the nucleon experienced 
field, and it establishes additional nuclear spin energy states to which 
nucleons can be excited by RF radiation.  As the magnetic field is shut off the 
excited states decay back to ground.  The decay radiation is what is monitored 
in an MRI medical scanner, I believe.

Nevertheless, in your concept what is the source of energy providing the excess 
heat in LENR? 

For example, I have always considered it is a loss of mass of the reactants 
that was converted to the phonic lattice energy.  The question has been: What 
is the mechanism for this loss of mass.  I have concluded it is spin energy of 
virtual excited particles, for example, 2 D particles fusing to form a virtual 
He* particle with high nuclear orbital spin.  The He*  decays to He ground 
state and distribution of the spin energy and its angular momentum to the many 
electrons of the coherent Pd system in small quanta of energy and angular 
momentum.  
 
Bob   
---- Original Message ----- 
  From: Frank Znidarsic 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2015 4:00 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Photon "storage" and quasi-coherence in alumina


  To Jones:  I presented and published The Constants of the Motion Theory in 
2000 at the a meeting of the ANS.  That was long before the dogbone and the 
other papers and comments. 


  http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/787504



  Bob, Yes my model is magnetic.  The magnetic force is not conserved.  More 
mutual magnetic flux can come with the addiction of iron.  The magnetic field 
goes away when the current is turned off.


  My theory, however, is not electromagnetic.  It is spin orbit magnetic (the 
magnetic component of the strong nuclear force) and gravitomagnetic (the 
magnetic component of gravity).  These are not increased by the addition of 
soft iron.  A vibration Bose condensate is required.  The frequency of 
vibration and the domain length equals 1.094,000 meters per second.


  As the range of the nuclear magnetic force exceeds the range of the coulombic 
force nuclear reactions bypass the coulombic potential well.  No radiation is 
emitted under this condition.


  I derived the quantum condition as a classical effect of this vibration.


  http://benthamopen.com/FULLTEXT/CHEM-1-21


  Frank Znidarsic














  -----Original Message-----
  From: Bob Cook <[email protected]>
  To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
  Sent: Sun, Apr 5, 2015 10:44 am
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Photon "storage" and quasi-coherence in alumina


  Frank 


  If the forces that connect the part of your model for resonance are magnetic, 
even in part, a magnetic field will change the resonant frequencies that exist 
IMHO.  Does your analysis consider magnetic forces? 


  Bob Cook 



  Sent from Windows Mail 


  From: Frank Znidarsic
  Sent: ‎Saturday‎, ‎April‎ ‎4‎, ‎2015 ‎1‎:‎51‎ ‎PM
  To: [email protected] 




  Good analysis Jones.  


  What might the natural frequency be?  Metallic photons resonate at about 10 
exp 12 hertz (tera hertz).  A metal highly loaded with hydrogen resonates a bit 
higher at about 2X10 exp 13 hertz.  2X10 exp 13 hertz times 50x10 exp -9 (50 
nano meters) equals about million meters per second.  That speed, according to 
my analysis, equals the velocity of sound in the nucleus. 


  Finally;  The constants of the motion converge in a Bose condensate 
stimulated at that dimensional frequency (velocity). 





  Frasnk Z 


  -----Original Message----- 
  From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> 
  To: vortex-l <[email protected]> 
  Sent: Sat, Apr 4, 2015 11:10 am 
  Subject: [Vo]:Photon "storage" and quasi-coherence in alumina 


  A valid question for better understanding the thermodynamics of the dogbone 
type of reactor is “why alumina”? 
  Apparently Parkhomov does not use pure alumina, and his reactor show s the 
same kind of optical translucence as do others – which is an intense glow, 
especially at the threshold temperature, which appears to be 1050-1100 C . This 
temp. corresponds to a wavelength which has been associated with the surface 
plasmon phenomenon, so it is no accident that it could also be a threshold 
value in LENR . 
  Perhaps alumina is also used simply because a ceramic is needed to limit 
thermal transfer , but there could be a reason related to “ photon ic storage. 
” There are a number of choices for tubes – and the proper optical dynamics of 
the tube could make a profound difference in the outcome due to the fact that 
photons of light are necessary to produce the surface plasmon phenomenon . 
These photons need a level of coherence, but possibly less than full laser 
-like coherence. This is where “super-radiance” comes into play. 
  The re is a new and growing field of technology called “slow photons” or 
photon storage (not to be confused with optical storage). Essentially some 
materials – often based on alumina ( since it is translucent for some 
frequencies of IR ) will store photons for a significant period of delay . The 
material is essentially crammed full of photons, which come from incandescence 
of the resistance wir e and are slowed and stored . 
  These photons go into the tube and bounce around for long periods of time , 
without loss, before emerging as the glow we see . As the photons bounce aroun 
d internally, the y begin to cohere in wavelength – in a similar way that a gas 
laser operates – which is based on rays of light bouncing between mirrors. 
  The dogbone reactor at about 1100C can be described as an unfocused quasi- 
laser. 
  Wiki has a decent reference 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slow_light 
  BTW – surrounding the dogbone reactor with a steel tube, which has been 
polished on the interior surface to a mirror finish – would likely make the 
device much more efficient … if … the operative mechanism for gain is SPP . 
  Jones 

Reply via email to