Axil--

You said Cook said this: "Cook says that high energy alpha particles exit the 
NAE at high energy and deliver their energy to the far field at an some 
indeterminate distance from the NAE that produced the energy."  

I did not see this statement.  Where was Cook's statement made?

What I saw in the new paper was that the energy of the alphas from the Be-8 
decay was in the form of 17 Mev of angular momentum (spin energy)--not kinetic 
energy.  (The slowing-down of 17 MeV alphas would cause noticeable x-rays and 
other high energy EM radiation.)  The alphas apparently stays put and transfers 
its excess energy via spin coupling, one spin quanta or so at a time.

Bob Cook


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: vortex-l 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 8:57 AM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea 
Rossi


  Like so many LENR theories, the Cook theory of the LENR reaction is not 
fundamental. Like almost all other LENR  theories, it deals with the emergent 
results of the fundamental LENR reaction without explaining the cause of the 
observed experimental results.


  If a theory cannot explain EVERY aspect of the experimental results in every 
dimension, it is not valid.
  In particular, the way energy of these high powered alpha particles are 
converted to heat is not addressed, even though that part of the LENR theory is 
central to how the energy of the nuclear reaction is converted to soft x-rays 
and extreme ultraviolet light.


  I have concluded from the experimental results derived from many LENR systems 
that the gamma suppression and the basic LENR nuclear reaction is tightly 
coupled together so that if a LENR based nuclear event occurs, no gamma is ever 
seen in a environment that has gotten hot enough (500C).


  Gamma suppression is an essential part of the LENR reaction.  So Gamma 
suppression is an essential part of what is going on inside the Nuclear Active 
Environment. If energy is carried away from the NAE, it cannot be converted to 
its final moderated form (soft x-rays and extreme ultraviolet light.) by the 
LENR reaction.  


  Cook says that high energy alpha particles exit the NAE at high energy and 
deliver their energy to the far field at an some indeterminate distance from 
the NAE that produced the energy. If this were true, there is always a slight 
chance that the alpha particle could exit the gas envelop and deposit its 
kinetic energy in the Alumina shell where a gamma ray would result. This gamma 
ray is never seen. So if an alpha particle is produced it must have little or 
no kinetic energy that is transferred to the far field.


  All the energy of the nuclear reaction is carried away from the NAE by the 
LENR reaction itself. The gamma emission is an intrinsic part of the LENR 
reaction energy transfer mechanism.




  On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:21 AM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:

    Jones Beene writes.  "this paper is cannot be taken seriously. A waste of 
time."

    I wish you wouldn't just damn the paper out of hand but give some reasons 
of just why it is wrong.  I don't have the knowledge of nuclear reactions that 
some others do here, but most of the theories seem far from solid to me and 
this one is no worse.  It should at least be considered.


Reply via email to