More...

AlainCo <https://disqus.com/by/AlainCo/>  Sanjeev
<http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/22/airbus-files-patent-for-lenr-power-generating-device/#comment-1922347660>
 • a month ago
<http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/22/airbus-files-patent-for-lenr-power-generating-device/#comment-1922382587>

I see mostly questions raised, because no hypothesis seems rational...

AB cannot do illegal things, especially on a public affair like that. Less
risky to buy, but here it seems internal developments.

they added TEG, and their electrode is coaxial... beside that I know AB
have the budget to test the patent works, and the details given show they
tested something real.


=============================

AXIL:

More likely, AIRBUS bought the technology from somebody...an insider,,, a
middleman who has access to the DGT detailed technology. If AIRBUS did
testing, the design would have happened to come from a working system. Who
built that system? Where did it come from? How long does it take to put
together a working Ni/H reactor?

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> From E catworld
> Mats Lewan <https://disqus.com/by/matslewan/> • a month ago
> <http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/22/airbus-files-patent-for-lenr-power-generating-device/#comment-1922290544>
>
> Since there are similarities to the LENR technology described by
> Defkalion, I wonder if Airbus could have been one of those large
> corporations that Defkalion claimed to have a collaboration with, focused
> on industry specific applications.
>
> Sanjeev <https://disqus.com/by/disqus_sanjeev/>  Mats Lewan
> <http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/22/airbus-files-patent-for-lenr-power-generating-device/#comment-1922290544>
>  • a month ago
> <http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/22/airbus-files-patent-for-lenr-power-generating-device/#comment-1922347660>
>
> If that is right, it can mean that DGT sold their tech to Airbus. (Or at
> least some parts). This can explain the sudden disappearance of DGT from
> the scene. Or it can mean, Airbus "lifted" the tech from DGT just like DGT
> lifted it from Rossi. Just speculation.
> It is anyway a big news and is as effective as a hand grenade to hit a
> skeptic with.
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Can someone find out who designed the AIRBUS system. How long did it take
>> to research the physics, chemistry, materials etc,,, Who designed the
>> reactor? How long did it take? How long did the testing take? How long did
>> it take to write the patent? Who has the connections to look into these
>> issues? Why is there such a lack of development history?
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Their presentations on ICCF 18 were quite good, though not flawless.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The president of Defkalion, Alexander Xanthoulis, said that the
>>> demonstration at ICCF18 failed. He said it was a mistake. He said that
>>> several times, including here:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://matslew.wordpress.com/2014/05/12/defkalion-demo-proven-not-to-be-reliable/
>>>
>>> - Jed
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to