>From E catworld Mats Lewan <https://disqus.com/by/matslewan/> • a month ago <http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/22/airbus-files-patent-for-lenr-power-generating-device/#comment-1922290544>
Since there are similarities to the LENR technology described by Defkalion, I wonder if Airbus could have been one of those large corporations that Defkalion claimed to have a collaboration with, focused on industry specific applications. Sanjeev <https://disqus.com/by/disqus_sanjeev/> Mats Lewan <http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/22/airbus-files-patent-for-lenr-power-generating-device/#comment-1922290544> • a month ago <http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/22/airbus-files-patent-for-lenr-power-generating-device/#comment-1922347660> If that is right, it can mean that DGT sold their tech to Airbus. (Or at least some parts). This can explain the sudden disappearance of DGT from the scene. Or it can mean, Airbus "lifted" the tech from DGT just like DGT lifted it from Rossi. Just speculation. It is anyway a big news and is as effective as a hand grenade to hit a skeptic with. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Can someone find out who designed the AIRBUS system. How long did it take > to research the physics, chemistry, materials etc,,, Who designed the > reactor? How long did it take? How long did the testing take? How long did > it take to write the patent? Who has the connections to look into these > issues? Why is there such a lack of development history? > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Their presentations on ICCF 18 were quite good, though not flawless. >>> >> >> The president of Defkalion, Alexander Xanthoulis, said that the >> demonstration at ICCF18 failed. He said it was a mistake. He said that >> several times, including here: >> >> >> https://matslew.wordpress.com/2014/05/12/defkalion-demo-proven-not-to-be-reliable/ >> >> - Jed >> >> >
