IMHO it is a warp but it is exactly balanced by segregation of regions [nano warps and nano wells] such that the net change is zero for the macro area where these regions exist. This segregation is how the EM side steps the unattainable energy calculated to create a macro sized warp [the Acrombie drive]. The anomaly depends on ambient gas molecules inside the drive to interact in a biased manner with one type of a region more than another to create an inertial imbalance. The vacuum test should still work if the device interior is sealed to maintain an atmosphere but I am unsure what will happen if both the interior and exterior are placed in vacuum [an effect might still exist in any loaded ambient gas trapped in the mirror surfaces but I think the vacuum will pump down most of those gases]. I agree with Shawyer’s claim that this is a relativistic drive but still argue the need to employ differential forces, without pitting the random motion of gas molecules against the equivalent accelerations imparted by the nano warps and wells established by the microwaves inside his tapered geometry I don’t think any net force can be measured. He needs a Heisenberg trap to harness the random motion of gas – we are told this ZPE is totally random and not exploitable but I think reducing vacuum wavelengths thru confinement is absolutely equivalent to increasing their wavelength thru near C acceleration or equivalent gravity wells.. let me make 2 points here.. the energy to accelerate a device is part of the energy balance but the energy to confine wavelengths is provided by the nature of lattice geometry [hall/London, Casimir]. I would suggest they use radioactive gas for the test atmosphere and predict anomalous half life decay proportional to the drive effect measured.. you cant get something for nothing so in effect the gas molecules are existing for longer on the time axis while existing “less” on the confined spatial axis [allowing us a caviat to the rule that HUP is too random and self-cancelling to exploit]…you get an inertial drive in exchange for older gas particles. I think this is still the same underlying principle as the Rossi drive but the effect is being driven by microwaves allowing him to brute force the effect at a larger scale while energy producing devices like the E-cat are instead focused on exploiting the passive effects of VP intersecting with nano confined gas particles. I still maintain Naudt’s had it right /hydrinos are relativistic hydrogen. Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 1:57 PM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Warp Drive detected? http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2015/04/nasa-may-have-accidentally-developed-a-warp-drive/
