This is a quantum vacuum disturbance, not a hot and cold disturbance. It decays. Our "weather" is the effect we see in our dimensions of space, which is emergent.
https://sdsimonson.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/waterspout-sunset-key-1.jpg https://sdsimonson.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/download.png On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Roarty, Francis X < francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: > Axil, welcome aboard, it’s been lonely on this limb and you are much > more suited than I to reinforce and champion the relativistic theory than > I. You added another great insight in this post [snip] LENR seems to > separate the vacuum into a positive zone and a negative zone. The positive > zone produces the fusion reaction, and the negative zone suppresses the > gamma and stabizes the radioactive results of the fusion.[/snip] .. everyone > focuses on the cavity and the negative vacuum pressure as the active region > but you additionally suggest the larger surrounding geometry [positive > vacuum] responsible for the cavity provides gamma screening. > > Fran > > > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 2:34 AM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way > above the Theoretical Limit > > > > Dear Francis X, > > > > I am coming around to your way of thinking. > > > > Regarding... > > > > “when lasers were fired through the EmDrive’s resonance chamber, some of > the beams appeared to travel faster than the speed of light. If that’s > true, it would mean that the EmDrive is producing a warp field or bubble. “ > > > > The resonant shape of the microwave EmDrive cavity produces a pattern of > positive and negative vacuum energy that corresponds to the high and low > energy pattern of microwave radiation generated by electromagnetic > interference. The zone of increased positive vacuum energy may produce > longer lived virtual particles whose lifetime is proportional to the > "false" vacuum value characterize by the zone of EMF excited vacuum. But to > keep energy conservation of the vacuum constant, a positive zone of vacuum > energy must also correspond with and be offset by a negative zone of vacuum > energy. > > > > The lifetimes of these longer lived virtual particles may be long enough > to provide a reaction platform that meets the requirements of Newton’s > momentum laws. > > > > > > Furthermore, there could be a connection between the EmDrive and the LENR > reaction. That connection could be the partitioning of the vacuum into > positive and negative zones. > > > > This might mean that the speed of light increases beyond its nominal value > in a zone of negative vacuum energy. In a homonginous vacuum, the speed of > forward photon propagation is determined by how fast the photon goes from > one virtual particle creation event to the next based on the density of > virtual particles produced in the vacuum by the averge virtual particle > creation rate. In a homogenous vacuum, If the average rate of photon > virtual particle interaction is steady, This steady rate of light’s > interatcion with the particles of the vacuum will produce a steady average > maximum speed of light through the vacuum. > > > > In a zone of negative vacuum energy, less virtual particles are produced. > This reduces the density of virtual particles encountered by the photon per > unit time. Less friction from the vacuum results, thereby increaseing the > speed of light through the zone of negitive vacuum energy. > > Time speeds up when the speed of light in increased. > > > > LENR seems to separate the vacuum into a positive zone and a negative > zone. The positive zone produces the fusion reaction, and the negative zone > suppresses the gamma and stabizes the radioactive results of the fusion. > > > > LENR will dramatically increase the decay rate of radioactive isotopes. > This might be caused by the entanglement of the nucleus of the radioactive > atom with the zone of negitive vacuum energy. The speed of time progression > in the radio active atom might be same as the speed of time in the zone of > negative vacuum energy. > > > > If this reaction is true, the rate of reduction of virtual particle > production in the zone of negative vacuum energy might be proportional to > the speed up of the rate of radioactive decay produced by LENR. > > > > In one experiment, a radioactive isotope with a half-life of 69 years was > reduced to 6 microseconds. > > > > That is 15 orders of magnitude reduction. Most halflife reductions in LENR > are instantaneous. Time could be moving very rapidly in the zone of > negative vacuum energy. There looks to be a way to share that increase in > the speedup of the rate of time with matter through the entanglement of > matter with the zone of negative vacuum...AKA the surface plasmon-polariton > soliton > > > > I segest this experiment with the EmDrive to verify this theory of time > acceleration. Place a gamma emmiting isotope inside an EmDrive enclosure > where the microwave interference is descriptive. If the rate of gamma > production is reduced and/or the half-life of the isotope is reduced then > the effects of negative vacuum energy on time will be verified both in the > EmDrive and in LENR. > > > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Roarty, Francis X < > francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: > > We don't know enough to answer the question because we don't know enough > about the origin of the force. Even if it is relativistic as Shawyer claims > and the spatial area occupied by the device modifies the encompassed > inertial frames that breach the isotropy there remains a strong likelihood > that an equal and opposite frame is created and the device is only able to > directionalize gravity to produce thrust..NOT able to accumulate a > buoyancy. IMHO his use of the term thrust is probably correct and that we > won't get a bubble from microwaves in a shaped cavity. > Fran > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 9:50 PM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above > the Theoretical Limit > > Hovering does not violate Newton's laws IMHO. Energy and momentum are > conserved. > > Bob Cook > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <mix...@bigpond.com> > To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 6:44 PM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the > Theoretical Limit > > In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message of Mon, 11 May 2015 18:58:16 > -0400: > Hi Frank, > [snip] > >The video states that m drive obeys Newtow's laws. It has no reaction > >mass. It does not obey Newton's laws. That comment was an understatement > >bordering on misinformation. > > > > > >Frank Z > > Which of Newton's laws does it violate? > > Does a car going down the road doesn't have reaction mass? Does it violate > Newton's laws? > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > > >
