Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:

So, I'd like to know about the NACA period of Orville. Maybe he had an
> important part in putting the whole thing to catch up with Europe.
>

I do not think he played a leading role in anything. He was a timid person.
However, he was serious and intelligent and I do not think he would have
been content to act as a mere figurehead. Pres. Wilson appointed him in
1920. I do not think he would have accepted the appointment if he did not
want to contribute.

Tom Crouch, in "The Bishop's Boys" describes his role in the NACA and the
Guggenheim foundation:

Orville remained a member of the NACA longer than anyone else in the
history of the committee. His record of attendance at the annual and
semiannual meetings over a period of twenty-eight years was exemplary, yet
his personal contributions had no special impact on the NACA program. He
concentrated on those issues of greatest interest to him, such as
championing the cause of the small inventors who wrote in search of advice
or assistance. He participated in discussions but rarely exercised
leadership. . . .

His service on the board overseeing the operation of the Daniel and
Florence Guggenheim Fund for the Promotion of Aeronautics fol­lowed a
similar pattern. The single most important privately funded effort to
improve the quality of American aeronautical enterprise during the interwar
years, the Guggenheim Fund began operation in 1926 and went out of business
in 1930. . . .

The members of the Guggenheim board funded pioneering research leading to
the development of early "blind-flying" instruments and sponsored the most
important of all U.S. aircraft safety competitions. The fund was
short-lived but had an extraordinary impact. Through his faithful
attendance at meetings and his participation in the deliber­ations of the
board, Orville helped to shape a program of lasting importance. His name
was a distinct asset to the work of the fund. As in the case of the NACA,
however, he rarely exercised leadership on the Guggenheim board.


- Jed

Reply via email to