The post above was removed from E Cat world. On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am disappointed in Rossi because Rossi has allowed the open source LENR > community to be misled by the Lagano report. We know now that the mouse is > the only reactor type that is powered under the Rossi latest reactor > architecture. The Cat is not powered and depends on the mouse as its > activator. Rossi knew full well when he gave this type of reactor to the > Lagano testers that it could only produce power at a level just over unity. > He knew that the Lagano power production numbers must have been in error > because a Mouse cannot produce all that power as Lagano claimed. > > Rossi also has told us that the mouse produces power just above over > unity. Real power comes when the mouse activates N numbers of non powered > sub-reactor units that he calls Cats. > > The errors that the Lagano team made in measuring the temperature and > power production capability of the ‘Mouse” that Rossi gave the Lagano test > team was left unchallenged even though Rossi knew that a mouse can only > produce power just over unity. When the Lagano errors are corrected, the > Lagano power adjustment shows power production just over unity. > > The open source community including MFMP is hell bent in showing power > production from the “mouse” to meet or exceed the invalid numbers that > Rossi has let stand from the results presented from the Lagano test. > > The Lagano test team had their own agenda in not correcting these > overblown power production numbers. That agenda is probably centered in > getting support for there own research funding from the authorities. > > All this subterfuge is not good for LENR. > > The open source community should move on from showing the inflated power > production numbers that Lagano has promulgated, and concentrate on getting > the “mouse” to activate N numbers of Cats so that LENR can show some real > solid over unity energy production. > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > >> For today >> >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/06/how-could-we-help-francesco-celani.html >> >> Peter >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > >
