Dave and Bob, I agree. Unfortunately, we don't really have much of an idea about how to get this to work at lower temperatures. Do we even know what temperature his reactor core is running at? We have an idea about the water/steam temps, but that doesn't really tell us anything about how hot the core / fuel is.
We could study what is known about the materials to get some clues. For example, if copper is used and connections are made with solder, then we know the operating range for the solder. If it's copper and the connections are brazed, then the range is extended. Regardless, perhaps the research into the hot cat will eventually lead back to the parameters that make the reaction work at lower temps. Jack On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Dave- > > I had a similar thought. For practical reasons the low temperature > devices should be much easier to get safety certifications which Rossi has > indicated in the past is a time consuming job. > > Bob Cook > > *From:* David Roberson <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 09, 2015 6:45 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from Italy > > It is not all that productive for us to discuss the Cat and Mouse > structure when we have never seen an example of one in operation. Who > really knows what Rossi is doing or what he is referring to? The > replicators should keep moving in the same direction as they are at the > this time until further evidence is obtained. > > I think the problem runs deeper than just a cat and mouse thing. I have a > strong suspicion that Rossi is keeping us concentrated upon the high > temperature devices while he works at break neck speed to get the actually > useful lower temperature ECAT into production. The replicators are > fighting enormous temperature problems while he is playing with normal > materials. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, Jun 8, 2015 11:57 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:quite good info, but some bad news from Italy > > Rossi came up the Mouse and Cat architecture to solve the control > problem. The open source LENR community have experienced a large number of > reactor blowouts when the reactor is fully loaded with fuel. > > The open source community could keep at the single reactor method for N > number of years, or do what Rsoo did to solve the control problem...tht is > to go with a clustered reactor architecture. > > IMHO, it seems near imposible to solve the reactor blowout problem when it > took Ross years to solve this issue. WHy reinvent the wheel when Rossi has > shoun the way. > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The open source community should move on from showing the inflated power >>> production numbers that Lagano has promulgated, and concentrate on getting >>> the “mouse” to activate N numbers of Cats so that LENR can show some real >>> solid over unity energy production. >> >> >> Does it not seem like a harder engineering feat to activate N cats with a >> mouse than to establish overunity output in a single operating device? >> >> Eric >> >> > >
