It is currently my sincere belief that the E-Cat goes through two phases on its way to stability and controllability as follows: a startup phase and a stable phase.
During the startup phase, the powered reactor (mouse) is in danger of a blowout due to the appearance of a hot spot at some arbitrary position in the fuel load of the reactor. This hot spot will reach very high temperatures and melt through the core and release the hydrogen envelope. Most alumina shell reactors will be destroyed in the startup phase by a hot spot as the reactor struggles to enter the stable phase. This blowout has happened to the Denis Vasilenko experiment. Unless the shell of the reactor is strong enough to resist the power of this hot spot, the experiment will result in reactor destruction. Most alumina reactor tests will end in this way as the hot spot destroys the reactor. But sometimes by chance, the alumina reactor gets through this startup phase and enters the stable phase. During this phase, hot spots cease to be a problem. For the alumina reactor, this stable condition is rare and only happens by chance. Out of all the experiments that Parkhomov has performed, his experiments have only resulted in a stable reactor but a few times. In the stable phase, blowout does not occur. However, meltdown can occur if the temperature of the reactor is pushed to high. Meltdown is not a blowout because a Meltdown continues even after the shell of the reactor has been destroyed. A meltdown occurs as a global over heating event throughout the entire volume of the core. A meltdown will not occur during the startup phase because a phase transition into stability has not occurred. The goal of an alumina reactor experiment is to get through the startup phase and enter the stability phase. Because of the fragility of the alumina shell, the stability phase is seldom achieved. To aid in getting through the startup phase, I suggest using a more robust reactor shell to contain the power of the hot spot or somehow reinforce the alumina tube with metal containment. On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Rossi said: > > Andrea Rossi > > June 16th, 2015 at 7:31 PM > > Paul: > > Looking at the derivatives I would answer more like popcorns, looking at > the integral I would say piece of charcoal. > > Warm Regards, > > Sibilla Cumana > ================ > > In this post, Rossi is speaking as the oracle Sibilla Cumana. The title > of Sibilla Cumana was held by the high priestess of the ' oracle of Apollo > (Greek sun god) and Hecate (ancient lunar goddess pre-Hellenic), located in > the city oraclemagnogreca of Cuma . She carried out its activities oracular > near Lake Averno , in a cave known as the '' The Sybil's Cave "where the > priestess, inspired by the gods, transcribed in hexameters his predictions > on leaves of palm which, at the end of prediction, were mixed by twenty > percent from the openings of the cave, making predictions "cryptic". Its > importance was in the Italic world equal to that of the famous oracle of > Apollo of Delphi in Greece > > Rossi wants to be oh so cleaver in this post. He enjoys feeding tidbits to > the jumping fish. He likes to see them flapping and spinning in the air. > > -------------------------------------------------- > > IMHO, “Looking at the derivatives” means that LENR occurs in the E Cat in > many powerful nanobursts. Each LENR nanobursts reaction is discrete. There > are many individual powerful bursts. When the reaction is looked at in > derivatives, many discrete events are seen. S the reaction increases, the > number of nanobursts increase. This is when control is in danger and the > blowout danger is great. > > If the reactor survives, the reaction matures and a state of Bose > condensation is established. When the reaction gets to this state of > maturity, it is looked at as an integral, these many individual events > occur at a constant nanoburst rate and on the average produces a smooth > production of energy over a extended time frame that is at a maximum at the > start but fades over time. > > When Bose condensation sets in, a state of super radiance is established. > Each nanoburst effects all the others so that blowout is no longer a > problem. > > For example, Parknomov blowout many reactors, but just by luck one > survived the blowout phase. Once super radiance set in, blowout is no > longer a problem because the nanoburst moderate each other in a super-atom > averaging process...the nanobursts talk to each other through quantum > mechanics. In this super radiant stage the nanobursts essentially have the > same energy output based on quantum mechanical averaging. > > What Rossi has done is make sure that the mouse survives the initial > nanoburst phase by keeping the COP of the mouse very low. The mouse will > always make it to the super radiant stage. The mouse transfers the quantum > mechanical super atom Bose condensate condition to one or more Cats. These > Cat do not face the danger of the nanoburst stage. All the Cats become > super radiant. The Cats become very productive in a state of global shared > Bose condensation. > > . > > When many individual reactors are controlled in a sequence where the > initial burst from the reaction drives the next reactor to produce a > quantum mechanically average global burst delayed in time and so on around > in a cycle of maximum to miniatum reaction intensity over many reactors, a > relatively constant amount of power can be produced. > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Strong local magnetic fields may be established by SPP entities at >> appropriate temperatures. The combination of correct temperature (phonic >> lattice vibrations) and magnetic field may create the necessary resonances >> (NMR and lattice vibrations) to allow new coherent system configuration >> with lower net binding energy. >> >> As you suggest, knowing the correct resonances may the key for >> engineering a working fuel particle and driver electronics. >> >> Bob Cook >> >> -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] >> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 3:36 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion >> >> In reply to Bob Cook's message of Thu, 18 Jun 2015 22:54:43 -0700: >> >> Hi, >> >> Yes, that's basically what I had in mind. Note however that in order for >> net >> energy to be released a nuclear reaction of some kind has to occur. >> Perhaps >> Rossi's theoretician is correct, and Li needs to be stimulated to a higher >> energy level before the fusion reaction can take place. NMR might be the >> mechanism that does that. If so, then it should be possible to engineer a >> much >> improved device, by concentrating on the gyromagnetic ratio of Li7 and >> providing >> frequency and magnetic field strengths to match. >> However there is also the possibility that as the Li7 becomes excited, the >> gyromagnetic ratio will change (due to a change in structure of the >> nucleus). >> This could be another reason that the varying magnetic field is >> important:- it >> can "follow" the change and supply the correct field strength repeatedly. >> >> Robin-- >>> >>> I CONCUR WITH YOUR MRI (NMR) THOUGHT. >>> >>> It is my understanding that the resonance with magnetic dipoles of a >>> nucleus >>> is with a RF signal that invokes a small energy shift in the subject >>> nucleus. These resonances are modified by a magnetic field. The energy >>> absorbed in a resonant transition reflects a differential spin quantum >>> number from the ground (unexcited) energy state of the subject nucleus. >>> The >>> energy associated with a single spin quanta is small. It may be >>> possible to >>> excite nuclear magnetic dipoles by more than one quanta and reach a >>> higher >>> excited energy state than one spin quanta above the base. The resulting >>> "eximer" may not decay to the original base state, but to an entirely >>> different nucleus with a loss of mass (spin energy mass) distributed as >>> thermal energy to the rest of the coherent system to which it is coupled. >>> >>> In the case of LiAlH bonded to a Ni nano particle, maybe with dissolved >>> H in >>> the Ni lattice, all of which is a coherent system. >>> >>> Bob Cook >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] >>> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 8:13 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cat stimultion >>> >>> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 18 Jun 2015 20:43:15 -0400: >>> Hi, >>> [snip] >>> >>>> >>>> http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/27/rossi-natural-gas-powered-e-cat-not-a-matter-of-simple-heat/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Natural gas did not work. Its more than just heat. >>>> >>> >>> That's interesting. It made me think of MRI where resonance occurs for a >>> specific combination of frequency and magnetic field strength. If a >>> constant >>> frequency is available then resonance could be achieved by regularly >>> varying >>> the >>> magnetic field strength as would occur with AC current. >>> >>> Knowing your penchant for all things magnetic, I guess you have already >>> suggested this. :) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Robin van Spaandonk >>> >>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >>> >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> >
