Robin--
Your idea of gryomagnetic fields and associated resonances may be the key to
effecting a controlled reaction. T
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 9:44 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion
It is currently my sincere belief that the E-Cat goes through two phases on its
way to stability and controllability as follows: a startup phase and a stable
phase.
During the startup phase, the powered reactor (mouse) is in danger of a blowout
due to the appearance of a hot spot at some arbitrary position in the fuel load
of the reactor. This hot spot will reach very high temperatures and melt
through the core and release the hydrogen envelope.
Most alumina shell reactors will be destroyed in the startup phase by a hot
spot as the reactor struggles to enter the stable phase. This blowout has
happened to the Denis Vasilenko experiment.
Unless the shell of the reactor is strong enough to resist the power of this
hot spot, the experiment will result in reactor destruction. Most alumina
reactor tests will end in this way as the hot spot destroys the reactor.
But sometimes by chance, the alumina reactor gets through this startup phase
and enters the stable phase. During this phase, hot spots cease to be a
problem. For the alumina reactor, this stable condition is rare and only
happens by chance. Out of all the experiments that Parkhomov has performed, his
experiments have only resulted in a stable reactor but a few times.
In the stable phase, blowout does not occur. However, meltdown can occur if the
temperature of the reactor is pushed to high. Meltdown is not a blowout because
a Meltdown continues even after the shell of the reactor has been destroyed. A
meltdown occurs as a global over heating event throughout the entire volume of
the core.
A meltdown will not occur during the startup phase because a phase transition
into stability has not occurred. The goal of an alumina reactor experiment is
to get through the startup phase and enter the stability phase. Because of the
fragility of the alumina shell, the stability phase is seldom achieved.
To aid in getting through the startup phase, I suggest using a more robust
reactor shell to contain the power of the hot spot or somehow reinforce the
alumina tube with metal containment.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
Rossi said:
Andrea Rossi
June 16th, 2015 at 7:31 PM
Paul:
Looking at the derivatives I would answer more like popcorns, looking at the
integral I would say piece of charcoal.
Warm Regards,
Sibilla Cumana
================
In this post, Rossi is speaking as the oracle Sibilla Cumana. The title of
Sibilla Cumana was held by the high priestess of the ' oracle of Apollo (Greek
sun god) and Hecate (ancient lunar goddess pre-Hellenic), located in the city
oraclemagnogreca of Cuma . She carried out its activities oracular near Lake
Averno , in a cave known as the '' The Sybil's Cave "where the priestess,
inspired by the gods, transcribed in hexameters his predictions on leaves of
palm which, at the end of prediction, were mixed by twenty percent from the
openings of the cave, making predictions "cryptic". Its importance was in the
Italic world equal to that of the famous oracle of Apollo of Delphi in Greece
Rossi wants to be oh so cleaver in this post. He enjoys feeding tidbits to
the jumping fish. He likes to see them flapping and spinning in the air.
--------------------------------------------------
IMHO, “Looking at the derivatives” means that LENR occurs in the E Cat in
many powerful nanobursts. Each LENR nanobursts reaction is discrete. There are
many individual powerful bursts. When the reaction is looked at in derivatives,
many discrete events are seen. S the reaction increases, the number of
nanobursts increase. This is when control is in danger and the blowout danger
is great.
If the reactor survives, the reaction matures and a state of Bose
condensation is established. When the reaction gets to this state of maturity,
it is looked at as an integral, these many individual events occur at a
constant nanoburst rate and on the average produces a smooth production of
energy over a extended time frame that is at a maximum at the start but fades
over time.
When Bose condensation sets in, a state of super radiance is established.
Each nanoburst effects all the others so that blowout is no longer a problem.
For example, Parknomov blowout many reactors, but just by luck one survived
the blowout phase. Once super radiance set in, blowout is no longer a problem
because the nanoburst moderate each other in a super-atom averaging
process...the nanobursts talk to each other through quantum mechanics. In this
super radiant stage the nanobursts essentially have the same energy output
based on quantum mechanical averaging.
What Rossi has done is make sure that the mouse survives the initial
nanoburst phase by keeping the COP of the mouse very low. The mouse will always
make it to the super radiant stage. The mouse transfers the quantum mechanical
super atom Bose condensate condition to one or more Cats. These Cat do not face
the danger of the nanoburst stage. All the Cats become super radiant. The Cats
become very productive in a state of global shared Bose condensation.
.
When many individual reactors are controlled in a sequence where the initial
burst from the reaction drives the next reactor to produce a quantum
mechanically average global burst delayed in time and so on around in a cycle
of maximum to miniatum reaction intensity over many reactors, a relatively
constant amount of power can be produced.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Strong local magnetic fields may be established by SPP entities at
appropriate temperatures. The combination of correct temperature (phonic
lattice vibrations) and magnetic field may create the necessary resonances (NMR
and lattice vibrations) to allow new coherent system configuration with lower
net binding energy.
As you suggest, knowing the correct resonances may the key for engineering
a working fuel particle and driver electronics.
Bob Cook
-----Original Message----- From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 3:36 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Thu, 18 Jun 2015 22:54:43 -0700:
Hi,
Yes, that's basically what I had in mind. Note however that in order for net
energy to be released a nuclear reaction of some kind has to occur. Perhaps
Rossi's theoretician is correct, and Li needs to be stimulated to a higher
energy level before the fusion reaction can take place. NMR might be the
mechanism that does that. If so, then it should be possible to engineer a
much
improved device, by concentrating on the gyromagnetic ratio of Li7 and
providing
frequency and magnetic field strengths to match.
However there is also the possibility that as the Li7 becomes excited, the
gyromagnetic ratio will change (due to a change in structure of the
nucleus).
This could be another reason that the varying magnetic field is important:-
it
can "follow" the change and supply the correct field strength repeatedly.
Robin--
I CONCUR WITH YOUR MRI (NMR) THOUGHT.
It is my understanding that the resonance with magnetic dipoles of a
nucleus
is with a RF signal that invokes a small energy shift in the subject
nucleus. These resonances are modified by a magnetic field. The energy
absorbed in a resonant transition reflects a differential spin quantum
number from the ground (unexcited) energy state of the subject nucleus.
The
energy associated with a single spin quanta is small. It may be possible
to
excite nuclear magnetic dipoles by more than one quanta and reach a higher
excited energy state than one spin quanta above the base. The resulting
"eximer" may not decay to the original base state, but to an entirely
different nucleus with a loss of mass (spin energy mass) distributed as
thermal energy to the rest of the coherent system to which it is coupled.
In the case of LiAlH bonded to a Ni nano particle, maybe with dissolved H
in
the Ni lattice, all of which is a coherent system.
Bob Cook
-----Original Message----- From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 8:13 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cat stimultion
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 18 Jun 2015 20:43:15 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/27/rossi-natural-gas-powered-e-cat-not-a-matter-of-simple-heat/
Natural gas did not work. Its more than just heat.
That's interesting. It made me think of MRI where resonance occurs for a
specific combination of frequency and magnetic field strength. If a
constant
frequency is available then resonance could be achieved by regularly
varying
the
magnetic field strength as would occur with AC current.
Knowing your penchant for all things magnetic, I guess you have already
suggested this. :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
