Jed Rothwell wrote:
See:

Iyengar, P.K. and M. Srinivasan. /Overview of BARC Studies in Cold Fusion/. in /The First Annual Conference on Cold Fusion/. 1990. University of Utah Research Park, Salt Lake City, Utah: National Cold Fusion Institute.

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/IyengarPKoverviewof.pdf

This is important because it shows how much dynamic, promising research was going on in India from 1989 to the mid-90s. Unfortunately, nothing is happening there now, as far as I know. I have heard that after Iyengar and the others retired, the enemies of cold fusion moved in and took steps to prevent any more research.

I did a lot of work to prepare this paper, so you folks better read it!

OK, OK! I'm reading it!  :-)

I just started looking at it -- got through the first few pages -- and a couple of things stood out that I don't understand. It's going to take a while before I get through the rest of it so I thought I'd ask about this now rather than digging through the theory section first.

First, they apparently were seeing neutrons and tritium _right_ _away_ in active cells, as the Pd was being loaded. This is in stark contrast to excess heat, which only appears after the Pd is fully loaded. Did I misunderstand this? It seems weird. Does anyone have a theory that explains why the tritium and neutrons might be produced sooner than the first excess heat bursts?

Second, it took a while for it to sink in, but they kept talking about "anomalously low neutron counts" -- tritium was found, with just one neutron being emitted per ~ 10^7 tritium atoms produced. I don't understand this. They were using pure D20, so H+D->T is not a candidate reaction; in fact, it would appear that D+D->T+n is the only path that seems likely to produce tritium. But then, where did the neutrons go?

Is it possible that something was fusing with the Pd itself?

I am depressingly ignorant of the theories that have been put forth to explain CF (aside from a general impression that there are an awful lot of them), but none the less this seems puzzling. Is there any generally accepted ;-) "speculation", at least, that anyone on the list is aware of, for how this could happen?


- Jed

Reply via email to