<snit>that the conservation laws should be respected</snip>


Thanks Perter.  The magnetic fields are NOT conserved!  That included 
electromagnetic, gravito magnetic ,and nuclear spin orbit.


Good, very good comment Peter.




-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Znidarsic <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 4:31 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a special issue of EGO OUT


 Even if we accept the theoretical possibility that collective nuclear 
reactions can take place (by an totally unknown physical mechanism) it is 
absolutely necessary that the conservation laws should be respected- 
conservation of energy, barions, leptons, and of electric charge. It was worked 
out a computerized model that has immediately shown that there is no solution 
for the nuclear processes based on weak nuclear interactions as beta decay and 
K-capture, that is transition from a neutron to a proton and conversely because 
such combinations cannot satisfy the above shown requirements. 
 
   
    
     
      
Good, lets also dump the funkey hydrinos, either vortexes, atomic cracks, and 
Casimer cavities.      
      
There is another force at work in the nucleus.  Its the magnetic component of 
the strong nuclear      
      
      force.  It called the spin orbit force.  It is NOT of electromagnetic 
origin. So lets not go there--again.   It like the (electrical) magnetic  
component is not conserved.  It is boundless under the right conditions.     
      
      
      
      
      Soft iron increases the magnetic field by the factor of 10,000.  I 
believe the vibrating Bose condensate does the      
      
      same for for the spin orbit force.  The freq of vibration depends of 
size.  It is 1,094,000 hetrz-meters.     
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      thanks Peter.     
      
      
      
      
      Frank Znidarsic     
     
    
   
 

Reply via email to