This experiment shows what happens when a lot of matter is packed into a small volume of space. This situation is the play ground of quantum mechanics where its weird nature comes to the fore and the uncertainty principle is enhanced. There is a increase in the superposition of particles and the entanglement of their properties. It took science 50 years to determine the nuclear spin of Pu239 because of the changing nature of the makeup of the Pu239 nucleus.
In this highly condensed state of matter, protons and neutrons are the same particle in a superposition. The properties of the particles that compile the nucleus behave as if they were waves in the ocean. These variations in spin, charge, and energies are reflected in the behavior of the electrons that orbit the nucleus. This is why the theories of Norman D. Cook and A. Rossi do not correspond to the real quantum mechanical nature of the nucleus. Protons and neutrons are not cue balls that stay put in a fixed location in space. These particles are sometimes protons and sometimes neutrons and oftentimes both protons and neutrons together. The more mass that is packed into a given volume of space, the weirder things get. The research recently done in heavy element collisions show that the combined nucleus behaves like a perfect liquid. So much matter is packed into a suxh a small volume that matter becomes a soup where all particles lose there individuality. On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > This research “could have” relevance for LENR (but otherwise would be > irrelevant to the field, and of course is not mentioned). The article is > merely the golf tee for a long par-5 on the back nine J > > *http://phys.org/news/2015-07-neutrons-magnetism-plutonium.html* > <http://phys.org/news/2015-07-neutrons-magnetism-plutonium.html> > > One aspect of this discovery goes to a broader interpretation (broader than > merely explaining a feature of the element plutonium) – and it can be > stated this way: there is a parameter called “hidden magnetic flux” which > is a rapid natural oscillation at the atomic or atomic crystal structure > level; and this rapid oscillation could be a feature of a number of elements > and alloys, besides plutonium, including mu metals. > > For instance, a broader interpretation of this R&D could (in the future) > help explain why mu metals are so effective at absorbing magnetic flux… > and more. > > Anyway, alloys where rapid self-flux is seen without external input, > could be ideal matrices for LENR (this is supposition only as of now). In > short, the present suggestion is that there could be a new magnetic phenomenon > in play, which goes a long way towards explaining the magnetic > relationship of hydrogen to the metal lattice, in enhanced LENR. > > The magnetic fluctuations (of the present research) are a result of differ > ing numbers of electrons in plutonium's valence shell, which valence > electron count is seen to CHANGE rapidly (this is heretofore unique in > physics). Conventional EM theory, which has seldom been wrong, predicted > long ago that the element plutonium should have strong magnetic ordering, > like iron. However, no evidence for that magnetic ordering has been found > until > 70 years later – and only recently has plutonium's "missing" magnetism > been resolved as an internal oscillation. IOW – it is temporary and os > cillating without external input. This could be the kind of breakthrough > in understanding of a number of unrelated systems. > > Using neutron scattering, the direct measurement of the elements > fluctuating magnetism was witnessed - and the authors surmise a constant > state of flux, making it nearly impossible to detect at the macro level, > but very energetic locally. This has potential implications for LENR > since the effect is seen at the atomic level, and although plutonium is not > a proton conductor, there could easily be other alloys which react in a > similar way to Pu (changing valence) and which would then be poised to > moderate the movement of dissolved atomic hydrogen. For instance, nickel > has a known but rarely encountered feature of several transition metals – > hexavalency. However, the hexavalency of nickel is not oscillating > (normally) ... except… perhaps one can imagine a nickel alloy, where the > crystal structure is ideal to promote an oscillating change of valence on > a short time scale. > > It goes without saying that when hydrogen goes from its molecular state, > H2, to its atomic state, it also goes from diamagnetic repulsion to > extreme susceptibility. > > This could provide rapid acceleration, unheard of at the macro level. At > the sub-nanometer geometry, a proton with a single electron (aligned) has > a 12.5 Tesla equivalent magnetic field… consequentially, acceleration > gradients could be enormous. > > Do I get a “mulligan”, if this speculation is wrong? Will Janoschek > include me on the paper if it is correct? > >
