http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202005/MoonModel_F04.pdf
Article goes into some molecular magnetism theories, see ending of paper in
section 4.Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
On Saturday, July 11, 2015 2:58 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
This experiment shows what happens when a lot of matter is packed into a small
volume of space. This situation is the play ground of quantum mechanics where
its weird nature comes to the fore and the uncertainty principle is enhanced.
There is a increase in the superposition of particles and the entanglement of
their properties. It took science 50 years to determine the nuclear spin of
Pu239 because of the changing nature of the makeup of the Pu239 nucleus.
In this highly condensed state of matter, protons and neutrons are the same
particle in a superposition. The properties of the particles that compile the
nucleus behave as if they were waves in the ocean. These variations in spin,
charge, and energies are reflected in the behavior of the electrons that orbit
the nucleus.
This is why the theories of Norman D. Cook and A. Rossi do not correspond to
the real quantum mechanical nature of the nucleus. Protons and neutrons are not
cue balls that stay put in a fixed location in space. These particles are
sometimes protons and sometimes neutrons and oftentimes both protons and
neutrons together. The more mass that is packed into a given volume of space,
the weirder things get.
The research recently done in heavy element collisions show that the combined
nucleus behaves like a perfect liquid. So much matter is packed into a suxh a
small volume that matter becomes a soup where all particles lose there
individuality.
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
This research “could have” relevance for LENR (but otherwise would be
irrelevant to the field, and of course is not mentioned). The article is merely
the golf tee for a long par-5 on the back nine
Jhttp://phys.org/news/2015-07-neutrons-magnetism-plutonium.htmlOne aspect of
this discovery goes to a broader interpretation (broader than merely explaining
a feature of the element plutonium) – and it can be stated this way: there is a
parameter called “hidden magnetic flux” which is a rapid natural oscillation at
the atomic or atomic crystal structure level; and this rapid oscillation could
be a feature of a number of elements and alloys, besides plutonium, including
mu metals. For instance, a broader interpretation of this R&D could (in the
future) help explain why mu metals are so effective at absorbing magnetic flux…
and more.Anyway, alloys where rapid self-flux is seen without external input,
could be ideal matrices for LENR (this is supposition only as of now). In
short, the present suggestion is that there could be a new magnetic phenomenon
in play, which goes a long way towards explaining the magnetic relationship of
hydrogen to the metal lattice, in enhanced LENR.The magnetic fluctuations (of
the present research) are a result of differing numbers of electrons in
plutonium's valence shell, which valence electron count is seen to CHANGE
rapidly (this is heretofore unique in physics). Conventional EM theory, which
has seldom been wrong, predicted long ago that the element plutonium should
have strong magnetic ordering, like iron. However, no evidence for that
magnetic ordering has been found until 70 years later – and only recently has
plutonium's "missing" magnetism been resolved as an internal oscillation. IOW –
it is temporary and oscillating without external input. This could be the kind
of breakthrough in understanding of a number of unrelated systems.Using neutron
scattering, the direct measurement of the elements fluctuating magnetism was
witnessed - and the authors surmise a constant state of flux, making it nearly
impossible to detect at the macro level, but very energetic locally. This has
potential implications for LENR since the effect is seen at the atomic level,
and although plutonium is not a proton conductor, there could easily be other
alloys which react in a similar way to Pu (changing valence) and which would
then be poised to moderate the movement of dissolved atomic hydrogen. For
instance, nickel has a known but rarely encountered feature of several
transition metals – hexavalency. However, the hexavalency of nickel is not
oscillating (normally) ... except… perhaps one can imagine a nickel alloy,
where the crystal structure is ideal to promote an oscillating change of
valence on a short time scale.It goes without saying that when hydrogen goes
from its molecular state, H2, to its atomic state, it also goes from
diamagnetic repulsion to extreme susceptibility. This could provide rapid
acceleration, unheard of at the macro level. At the sub-nanometer geometry, a
proton with a single electron (aligned) has a 12.5 Tesla equivalent magnetic
field… consequentially, acceleration gradients could be enormous.Do I get a
“mulligan”, if this speculation is wrong? Will Janoschek include me on the
paper if it is correct?
