Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
> Furthermore, it is bad to base a theory of E-Cat reaction on the > production of ionizing radiation. Any source of nuclear radiation has, is, > and will be regulated. This most probably will place regulation of the > E-Cat under the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) nationally in the U.S.A. > and the IAEA internationally. > This is a surreal assertion. It makes no sense to say that basing a theory on this is a bad thing! The E-Cat is what it is. If the E-Cat does produce ionizing radiation, that is an inescapable fact. It will surely be discovered long before the device can be commercialized. Whatever institutions are now in charge of regulating ionizing radiation will be in charge of the E-Cat in that case. Perhaps these institutions can be changed, or the rules can be changed, but the radiation itself cannot be. You cannot avoid or negate radiation by changing the theory. A theory has no influence over reality. It can only explain that reality, or fail to explain it -- in which case it is useless. - Jed
