The alphas do not have to be the recipient of the mass energy loss as kinetic 
energy.  The mass energy in a coherent system may end up with excess spin 
energy which is then distributed as phonic energy of the coherent system’s 
lattice.  

Bob Cook

From: Axil Axil 
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 1:34 PM
To: vortex-l 
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi's theory of the LENR reaction

Regarding: "... the E-Cat is a massive source of alpha particles"

I have not seen this confirmed as an experimental observation. I understand 
that this statement has its origins in the theory proposed from N. Cook. I find 
this statement hard to believe since energetic alpha particle emission produces 
lots of powerful EMF such as gamma rays in the process of Alpha thermalization.

Out of the various successful replications, no one has confirmed the detection 
of Alpha radiation or gamma radiation. To make the N. Cook theory complete, 
there should be reasons and mechanisms provided that explain how the gamma 
radiation from Alpha particles are thermalized or downshifted.

Furthermore, it is bad to base a theory of E-Cat reaction on the production of 
ionizing radiation. Any source of nuclear radiation has, is, and will be 
regulated. This most probably will place regulation of the E-Cat under the 
Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) nationally in the U.S.A. and the IAEA 
internationally. In other words to make a long story short, the theory of Alpha 
particle production will KILL the E-Cat and all its various uses worldwide. 
Does Rossi understand that his current reaction theory will kill the E-Cat?

The theory of the E-Cat has quintessential political and regulatory 
ramifications. The formulation of LENR theory must explain how the LENR 
reaction is not harmful in any way, shape or form, that it is totally benign, 
and that it is supported by experiential observation. The theory of LENR must 
be crafted so that it does not place a killing weapon into the hands of the 
opponents of LENR. Does Rossi understnd this? I would advise Rossi to change 
his theory for LENR now.

Reply via email to