blaze, if not for the overhead eating efficiency created by mass building, those things wouldn't exist. and the jobs you are describing are a SMALL fraction of the jobs available, and the ones Joe is listing the vast MAJORITY.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: > No, any sort of job that increases communication and education I don't see > as generally planet wrecking, though certainly we could do a lot better. > I'm talking about the excess energy consumption, cars, the houses, the > yachts, the airplanes, the military to protect all this, etc etc. > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Joe Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So would you consider the jobs required to create, support and run the >> internet, networks and infrastructure that this list runs on as bullsh*t >> planet wrecking consumption? >> How about the jobs to create and deliver the computer, tablet or mobile >> device you use to post on this and all of the associated software required >> to do that? >> I'm not suggesting you were advocating that you were not a part of the >> bullsh*t planet wrecking consumption - just questioning if in your mind >> there were any other categories between safety, security, etc and bullsh*t >> planet wrecking consumption. :) >> >> >> >> >> On 8/4/15 5:03 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: >> >>> it's all pretty much just useless bullsh*t planet wrecking consumption. >>> >>> >> >
