No reactor that produces any amount of tritium will ever be sold! On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:42 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:
> He obviously wants to show that his reaction is nuclear by the tritium > production. Let's hope that the amount generated is not going to be an > issue for regulators. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, Aug 31, 2015 2:25 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response > > It seems to me that what you don;t want to do is design a reactor that > produces tritium. Tritium production is a nonstarter in the reactor > business. The NRC will shut down any reactor that produces tritium even in > the smallest amounts. What is Godes thinking here? > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> “We are an engineering company. We are making equipment that companies >>> should be able to go out and produce things themselves. We don’t want to >>> produce things; it’s not what Brillouin is about. . . . >>> >> >> >>> >>> Jed, did you not understand the business plan explained here? >>> >> >> Yes, I think I understand it better than Godes does. He says he "does not >> want to produce things" yet he spends millions of his investor's dollars >> producing things! >> >> If this is really his strategy, then he should make a device that >> produces heat around 100 to 1000 W. He should make it as reliable as he >> can, with the best power density. He should demonstrate it is real. >> Everything after that should be left to his customers, which should be >> industrial corporations. When it comes to engineering a 104 kW heat source >> or a generator, they have immeasurably more experience and expertise that >> he does. Plus they probably would not like to see him compete with them. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
