I was reading the entry for cold fusion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion
While I agree with this statement: *Cold fusion is a hypothetical type of nuclear reaction <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reaction> that would occur at, or near, room temperature <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_temperature>. This is compared with the "hot" fusion <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion> which takes place naturally within stars <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_sequence>, under immense pressure and at temperatures of millions of degrees.* The following statement is utterly false: *There is currently no accepted theoretical model which would allow cold fusion to occur.* For example, both muon and pyro electric fusion will occur at room temperatures. We also now have a published statement about laser induced fusion happening at low temperatures. I think we're doing a massive disservice to researchers everywhere by obsessively defining the concept of "cold fusion" as pons/fleischman. Normal people care whether fusion can occur with minimal investment and low temperatures. I think it will also help the community at large if they view cold fusion as completely doable. There will be increased investment in the area if people can use the term without having to apologize. Hopefully people will stop wasting money on these moronic ITER experiments.
