Hey Axil, The technical reasons he is no good is your opinion. I have no way to counter that. Just make sure you are not going to have to eat that. It is easy to be categoric using all existing knowledge and in the end have to eat crow. :) If you are right and he has the time to google our blog he will certainly think it over. If I could I would tell him your point. I just do not fully see the difference. I am sure you can email him at Goteborg's univeritet. He looks alive:0
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com [email protected] +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Holmlid is not thinking logically. First, there is only hot fusion and > cold fusion, nothing in between. If he is producing hot fusion, then he > would see gamma radiation coming from the impact of high speed neutral > particles produced by the copper shield that surrounds the reaction spot. > The lack of gamma radiation is a sure sign that the reaction that he is > producing is cold fusion. > > Holmlid is a smart guy, it is hard to understand how he could not > understand the difference between hot and cold fusion. Could Holmlid be > doing the same thing that R. Mills has done, to deny that his research is > based on LENR to get people to take him seriously. Does he want to get the > scientific community to swallow the hook so that he can reel them in? Once > they are flopping around on the dock, he will tell them that they are > seeing cold fusion. > > One of those hot fusion developers will eventually ask how Holmlid is not > dead from high energy neutron exposure and gamma radiation, What will > Holmlid say then? He cannot hide reality from the world forever. > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> http://www.chem.info/news/2015/09/scientists-closing-small-scale-nuclear-fusion >> >> http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/karnkraft/article3933699.ece >> >> Too bad Mats didn't get to write that :( >> > >
