I had Holmlid as lecturer in the basic course of physical chemistry
at Göteborg university around 1990. 

He had a reputation as a brilliant
scientist but a awful advisor among the graduated students.  

At that
time he was involved in development of solar cells. 

On Thu, 1 Oct 2015
16:58:41 -0400, Axil Axil  wrote:  
I don't know if its wise to disabuse
Holmlid from his opinion at this early juncture. It might be better to
get other main stream scientists to replicate his work assuming it is
hot fusion. It would then be great to show that all that replicated
technology was in fact cold fusion. 

Let us not kill this chicken
before it can hatch.  

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Lennart Thornros
wrote:

Hey Axil, 
The technical reasons he is no good is your opinion.
I have no way to counter that.  
Just make sure you are not going to
have to eat that. It is easy to be categoric using all existing
knowledge and in the end have to eat crow. :) 
If you are right and he
has the time to google our blog he will certainly think it over. If I
could I would tell him your point. I just do not fully see the
difference.  
I am sure you can email him at Goteborg's univeritet. 
He
looks alive:0  

Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros


www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com [2] 

[email protected]
+1 916 436
1899 
202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 

"Productivity is never
an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence,
intelligent planning, and focused effort." PJM     

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015
at 11:11 AM, Axil Axil  wrote:

Holmlid is not thinking logically.
First, there is only hot fusion and cold fusion, nothing in between. If
he is producing hot fusion, then he would see gamma radiation coming
from the impact of high speed neutral particles produced by the copper
shield that surrounds the reaction spot. The lack of gamma radiation is
a sure sign that the reaction that he is producing is cold fusion.


Holmlid is a smart guy, it is hard to understand how he could not
understand the difference between hot and cold fusion. Could Holmlid be
doing the same thing that R. Mills has done, to deny that his research
is based on LENR to get people to take him seriously. Does he want to
get the scientific community to swallow the hook so that he can reel
them in? Once they are flopping around on the dock, he will tell them
that they are seeing cold fusion. 

One of those hot fusion developers
will eventually ask how Holmlid is not dead from high energy neutron
exposure and gamma radiation, What will Holmlid say then? He cannot hide
reality from the world forever.  

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Blaze
Spinnaker 
wrote:

http://www.chem.info/news/2015/09/scientists-closing-small-scale-nuclear-fusion
[5]

http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/karnkraft/article3933699.ece
[6] 

Too bad Mats didn't get to write that :(              


Links:
------
[1] mailto:[email protected]
[2]
http://www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
[3] mailto:[email protected]
[4]
mailto:[email protected]
[5]
http://www.chem.info/news/2015/09/scientists-closing-small-scale-nuclear-fusion
[6]
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/karnkraft/article3933699.ece

Reply via email to