I was referring in a very roundabout way to new military applications, although I doubt that allusion was at all clear to anyone.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: > There's plenty of observations that are more interesting than excess heat, > because, by itself, it is not proof LENR is nuclear. Radiations, > transmutations, isotopic shifts would all be more interesting than just > heat. Or, even proof that the excess heat was coming without nuclear > involvement - again more interesting. Piantelli says most of the > transition metals will host LENR - some with more radiation output than > others. Proof that in Pd(Rh)-D that the reaction was not D-D would also be > cool. > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:53 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> "... a number of more interesting effects." What could be MORE >>> interesting than excess heat/low energy nuclear reactions??? >> >> >> Some questions are better left unasked. One of the sisters could be >> Pandora. >> >> Eric >> >> >
