This experiment should be viewed through the lenz of our experience with the increase in the decay rate of radioactive isotopes. I have referenced many times here the experiment where U232 half life was decreased from 69 years to 6 microseconds.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 9:09 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:28:02 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >LENR changes the speed at which time flows by producing negitive vacuum > >energy. Positive vacuum energy make time flow more slowly whereas Negative > >vacuum energy makes time flow faster. This ability to control the speed at > >which time flows has been experimentally demonstrated in this experiment: > > > >http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/10/151013103115.htm > > This experiment describes a change in the half-life of an artificial atom > (actually an electronic circuit). That doesn't necessarily mean a change > in the > rate of flow of time. In fact, I get the impression that the resonance > implies > that the half-life is "atom" dependent. IOW two different "atoms" with > different > half-lives sitting next to one another would have different changes to the > their > half-lives, implying that the effect was not related to the flow of time in > general. > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
