Hi Jones, You and others have often speculated on a possible role of magnetism. In that regard I wonder if the recent finding by a Rice Univ. group (Yakobson et al; Nano Lett. Oct 15, 2015 "Riemann surfaces of carbon as graphene nanosolenoids") would be of interest. They found a 1T field induced by very low voltage in spiral graphene nanoparticles.
[BTW., Even tho I had gotten completely out of the stock market casino years ago, even before the 2008 crash, I did buy a thousand shares of Sunvault Energy stock a few months ago as a bet on Dr. Smith's thing!]. regards, ken On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Murray-Smith explains how carbon-carbon (graphene-graphite) > becomes self-charging > > *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLGtWEmTGl4&html5=1* > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLGtWEmTGl4&html5=1> > > This device blurs the distinction between battery and capacitor. It is > really a bit of both. > > There is no overunity – but the lifetime of the effect is surprising. > > This indicates a factoid which many of us have suspected for a long time > – there can be a lot more energy in normal “chemical energy” than > expected. Normal chemistry refers to valence electrons only. > “Suprachemistry” can refers to exploiting sub-valence electrons or > redundant orbits using chemistry – not fusion. > > It is not ruled out that the energy seen in many if not most forms of > LENR, including dense hydrogen, comes from “chemistry”. Holmlid now says > that the dense hydrogen state has binding energy of 630 eV (not 50 eV as > in an older paper). This is chemical energy, yet it can provide hundreds > of times more apparent gain than burning hydrogen in air. Yet it is not > “overunity” since it requires energy input to create the dense cluster. > > Jones >
