Axil, OK, I am glad you see this as being “sent” into the temporal axis which 
is key to what I am saying because it unbalances COE. Normal random motion 
cannot be harnessed to power a Maxwellian demon because the random motion of 
gas always cancels in 3d…. In 4d it becomes possible and this is what is 
happening when you have different fractional values of hydrogen forming 
molecules while randomly walking through a tapestry of quantum geometry 
[Casimir geometry] the molecular bond is weakened by the change in inertial 
frame/ Casimir geometry whenever the level of vacuum suppression changes[DCE]… 
if the vacuum density changes enough then the molecule will disassociate from 
just the local ambient heat EVEN if the threshold is lower than the level where 
the molecule originally formed [OU].. sooo get the reactor/gas molecules near 
threshold temp and then let random motion walk them through a tapestry of DCE 
and you can have runaway reactions… provided the lattice is fully packed with 
fractional hydrogen which is the fuel preparation you have noted… and why I 
mentioned Lyons furnace and the MAHG. It is certainly more complicated than 
that to keep from exhausting or runaway scenarios ..probably some control over 
the h1/h2 populations and currents not yet studied.
Fran

From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:51 PM
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid

The vacuum may well be involved. When a meson is produced, a negative energy 
version of the meson must also be produced via a closed time loop. But this 
negative energy version(or anti particle) is sent back in time via the vacuum. 
This particle in the past must be discarded to preserve causality. So the 
vacuum act like a trash can to take care of the bad stuff produced by the LENR 
reaction.

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Bob Cook 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Fran and Jones--

Thanks for those explanations.

However, I would bet that the US Patent Office would not agree with such an 
invention, if zero point energy were mentioned.  They would classify in the 
same category as perpetual motion machines.

Nevertheless, I understand from Fran’s comment that the positive kinetic energy 
“motion” of virtual particles in the vacuum are harnessed to provide potential 
energy to make heavy hydrogen, which in turn decays to a lower energy state via 
real EM radiation.  If the heavy hydrogen increased its size by increasing the 
kinetic energy of its electron, it would be an endothermic reaction I think and 
not what we are talking about.  Is this correct?

The endless reversible reaction Fran suggested would not seem to entail the 
release of EM radiation to heat the real surroundings, if energy is conserved 
between the vacuum and the real surroundings in a reversible reaction.

One other thought/question considering this thread—what dense hydrogen energy 
levels are involved in the reaction?  The lowest energy state and the highest 
one? or are there transitions between any of the dense hydrogen states?  If it 
were transitions between various energy states, one might expect to see a 
spectrum of EM  radiation from the Holmlid setup.

Bob Cook

From: Roarty, Francis X<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 12:08 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid

[snip] But in effect, if the hydrogen does not escape, the energy which can be 
extracted by chemistry is endless (if the source is the quantum vacuum).[/snip] 
which is why I tend to call it zero point energy since it is effectively 
harnessing random motion to move the hydrogen between the DCE regions that 
allow this endless chemical reversible reaction. Still very similar to the 
original premise behind Lyne atomic furnace and the MAHG..

From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 2:53 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid

From: Bob Cook

>

>  Fran and Jones suggested that the source of the excess energy described  by 
> Holmlid is of a chemical origin (electronic potential chemical energy of 
> dense hydrogen) and not nuclear potential energy long ago stored in the 
> reactants.

First part of answer: The Dynamical Casimir Effect was first observed in 2010. 
It is real, but that does not necessarily provide all the answers. The 
following is paraphrased from various sources.

The basic concept for LENR, is that the electronic chemical energy of dense 
hydrogen, with mass-energy in the range of 630 eV per H atom, is created by 
DCE. One way this can happen is when SPP interact with a Casimir cavity or pit. 
The electron becomes delocalized and possibly relativistic.

However, it is also demonstrated by Holmlid that dense hydrogen can produce 
strong nuclear or sub-nuclear gain in other circumstances, aside from 
chemistry. Whenever gamma radiation is seen in an experiment, it is a good 
indication of the “other circumstances”. The DCE modality only applies to gain 
from chemistry and electron manipulation. The soft x-rays are easy to miss.

One of the predictions of modern quantum theory is that the vacuum of space is 
not empty. In fact, quantum theory predicts that it teems with virtual 
particles foaming in and out of existence. While initially a curiosity, it was 
quickly realized that vacuum fluctuations had measurable consequences, for 
instance producing the Lamb shift and modifying the magnetic moment for the 
electron… and in Casimir force.

This type of renormalization due to vacuum fluctuations is now central to our 
understanding of nature….From early on, it was believed that it might be 
possible to more directly observe the virtual particles that compose the 
quantum vacuum, or convert them to real particles. 40 years ago, Moore 
suggested that a mirror undergoing relativistic motion could convert virtual 
photons into directly observable real photons. This effect was later named the 
dynamical Casimir effect (DCE)…. we have observed the DCE experimentally for 
the first time in 2011…. In addition to observing the creation of real photons, 
the discoverers found two-mode squeezing of the emitted radiation, which is a 
signature of the quantum character of the generation process. End of paraphrase.

>

>  Is the assumption that the laser pre-conditioning of the materials in the 
> Holmlid setup allowed the increase in potential energy of the reactants which 
> then is later released as EM radiation and hence heat?

Yes. Most likely there would be a multi-stage process where the laser (or 
another light source) creates SPPs over time, which then interact with hydrogen 
in a Casimir cavity of 2-12 nm in dimensions. As it turns out, Shell 105 
catalyst is extraordinarily nanoporous. Like a zeolite, but ferromagnetic. 
Curiously, Holmlid fails to realize this porosity connection.

The net effect is that the electron which once had ionization potential of 13.6 
eV in the ground state has been boosted to 630 eV of binding energy by the DCE. 
This is an energy increase of about 46:1 per atom and it is chemical. But in 
effect, if the hydrogen does not escape, the energy which can be extracted by 
chemistry is endless (if the source is the quantum vacuum).



Reply via email to