Yes, I respect goat guys’ comments even though he is skeptical of all things LENR or over unity, his positions are always logical and well founded. If you had to pick someone from the skeptics side to weigh in on an LENR theory he would be a good choice – may not tell you what you want to hear but you will get an honest analysis. fran
From: Bob Cook [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 10:00 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:EM drive at NASA Fran- Thanks for that link—very interesting. The comments of “Goatguy” on the item following the article are also quite interesting. He gives a nice description of the significance of “Q”, a dimensionless resonance multiplying factor affected by various engineering schemes to increase thrust to energy input ratios of the EM drive. The same sort of Q ideas may be appropriate for the design of LENR devices to improve/define their performance. For example, Q associated with the size of nano Ni in a reactor affecting resonant conditions may have a large impact on the design. Or Q associated with the Li-H fuel mix and appropriate laser frequencies may be important. Bob Cook From: Roarty, Francis X<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 3:30 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [Vo]:EM drive at NASA Upgraded model testing in process. http://nextbigfuture.com/2015/11/nasa-eagleworks-has-tested-upgraded.html
