https://www.mpq.mpg.de/5020726/0720a_Rydberg_blockade.pdf
Rydberg blockase is the quantum mechanical mechism whereby on typre of rydberg matter forses it state onto another type of matter. Potassium can force hydrogen in the rydberg matter state through entanglement. This is why a alkali metal is alway present as a secret sauce in the LENR process. But it is not rydberg matter that produces LENR effects. It is the surface plasmon polariton (SPP) condensates that rydberg matter catalyzes that produces the nuclear effects. These are balls of EMF that form when light and matter combine through entanglement. The Russians call this stuff ball lightning and Ken Shoulders called them EOV. The electron brings dipole energy to the polariton marriage, and light brings the ability of the polariton to aggregate in limitless density because it is a boson. Holmlid does not see the role of SPPs yet. These SPPs must be charged with huge amounts of energy before they become active in subatomic particle production through tachyon condensation. This is why LENR fuel preparation takes a long time. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like to see more discussion of Holmlid's evidence for existence of > the ultra-dense deuterium D(0). > > From my reading, I understand the evidence for Rydberg Matter (RM) > particles, and it is strong. This evidence is based on rotational > spectroscopy of clouds of RM particles - the "snowflakes" I previously > mentioned. Because these RM particles have such large electron orbitals > (the Rydberg states), the RM particle spectra is highly susceptible to > electric fields (well known Stark effect) and magnetic fields (Zeeman > effect). In fact, the Stark effect is so large, it can be used with RM to > make tunable RM lasers. RM forms from many atomic species, not just > hydrogen isotopes. This RM is NOT dense, and even sodium RM particles are > detected in the Earth's upper atmosphere, some 80 km high. Obviously, to > float in such a thin atmosphere, the mass density of the particles must be > relatively low. > > Now we come to Holmlid's propositions. The first proposition is that RM > can form in monolayers on a metal oxide surface. This is not too far > fetched. One could easily visualize a self-assembling effect of the > hexagons under the right conditions. Has Holmlid proved a continuous > film? I haven't seen that evidence. In other words, the Holmlid surface > condensed H(1) / D(1) as a continuous film could simply be isolated RM > particles that have attached to the metal oxide surface. > > Holmlid's next proposition is the spontaneous switching on the surface of > the purported D(1) film with 150 pm atomic spacing to the ultra-dense form, > D(0) having 2.3 pm spacing. First, is Holmlid expecting us to believe that > the entire surface film shrinks in lateral dimensions by a factor of 65? > Even if such a state switch could occur, it would be unlikely to occur in > the entire film simultaneously - I think it would rip itself into small > islands. > > What is Holmlid's evidence for the 2.3 pm ultra-dense D(0) state? As near > as I can tell, the evidence comes from the energy calculated from a > supposed Coulomb explosion - I.E. sudden failure of the mechanism holding > the atoms at such a small inter-atomic spacing caused by an incident > laser. If such potential energy existed for Coulomb explosion, then there > would be no natural means for even individual RM particles to switch to > this state - I.E. how can D(1) RM particles spontaneously jump to a > configuration having so much higher potential energy as D(0) is purported > to have? > > So, how can Holmlid say that the cause of the measured ejecta atoms is > Coulomb explosion? Could it not be that some form of energetic reaction > occurred between the substrate, the D(1) particles on the surface, and the > laser? Perhaps a LENR reaction? > > Somewhere, Miley and Holmlid parted theoretical company. I think that > Miley may believe that the RM particles could be complicit in LENR, but > perhaps he didn't buy into the ultra-dense hypothesis. > > Bob Higgins >
