Thanks for the paper. I should also mention Hopf fibrings solution(s) of
Maxwell equations that is EM is confined in a volume. Radiationless
solutions is also required for an electron model where the the spin is a
complex dynamics where the instantaneous magnetic moment is not parallel
(antiparallel) to particle angular momentum and oscillates in circles or
in more complex epicycloidal patterns at very high frequencies. Such a
models has not yet be proposed, however i think it be worth to consider
in the light of my experiments based on floating spinning magnets.
I would like also obtain the article shown (the ending page) on this
downloaded paper may having title 'CLASSICAL MOTIONS OF SPIN1/2
PARTICLES' if possible.
H Ucar
David Roberson
<https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=from:%22David+Roberson%22>
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:37:54 -0800
<https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=date:20151112>
Bob, this is an interesting derivation. I suspect that it can be boiled down
to what I have mentioned before which is that you can construct any three
dimensional shape that you wish out of constant current loops. Since each loop
does not radiate, any number of them also do not radiate. Also, they do not
have to be circular.
The key is to have a smooth distribution of charge flowing that does not allow
the accumulation and distribution of the resulting electric field as a function
of time. Mills orbitals follow that rule according to the way I read his
documentation.
An infinite number of three dimensional shapes exist that do not radiate
according to this simple criteria. Unfortunately, it is extremely difficult to
mathematically analyze complex structures of this type which leads to authors
only finding a few out of an infinite number of possibilities.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Higgins <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, Nov 12, 2015 6:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The vacuum is the glue that keeps the universe together.
It actually took me a while to get a readable copy of this paper and I have
cleaned up the better copy. Here is where I keep it on my Google drive:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5Pc25a4cOM2TllPckVraXNmLTg/view?usp=sharing
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
Do you have a link address?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote:
Axil, if you want to be informed about electrons and radiation/non-radiation,
you should read G. H. Goedecke's paper, "Classically Radiationless Motions and
Possible Implications for Quantum Theory", Physical Review, Volume 135, Number
1B, July 13, 1964. It tells of the criteria for electron motion to exist
without radiation.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
The vacuum is the glue that keeps the universe together.
It has also been shown that the atomic building blocks of matter are dependent
upon the Zero Point Energy (ZPE) for their very existence. This was clearly
demonstrated by Dr. Hal Puthoff of the Institute for Advanced Studies in
Austin, Texas. In Physical Review D, vol. 35:10, and later in New Scientist (28
July 1990), Puthoff started by pointing out an anomaly. According to classical
concepts, an electron in orbit around a proton should be radiating energy. As a
consequence, as it loses energy, it should spiral into the atomic nucleus,
causing the whole structure to disappear in a flash of light. But that does not
happen. When you ask a physicist why it does not happen, you will be told it is
because of Bohr's quantum condition. This quantum condition states that
electrons in specific orbits around the nucleus do not radiate energy. But if
you ask why not, or alternatively, if you ask why the classical laws of
electromagnetics are violated in this way, the reply may give the impression of
being less than satisfactory.
See:Harold E. Puthoff, "Everything for nothing", New Scientist, pp.36-39, 28
July 1990.
http://www.ldolphin.org/everything.html
Instead of ignoring the known laws of physics, Puthoff approached this problem
with the assumption that the classical laws of electro-magnetics were valid,
and that the electron is therefore losing energy as it speeds in its orbit
around the nucleus. He also accepted the experimental evidence for the
existence of the ZPE in the form of randomly fluctuating electromagnetic fields
or waves. He calculated the power the electron lost as it moved in its orbit,
and then calculated the power that the electron gained from the ZPF. The two
turned out to be identical; the loss was exactly made up for by the gain. It
was like a child on a swing: just as the swing started to slow, it was given
another push to keep it going. Puthoff then concluded that without the ZPF
inherent within the vacuum, every atom in the universe would undergo
instantaneous collapse. In other words, the ZPE is maintaining all atomic
structures throughout the entire cosmos.
When a magnetic beam of sufficient strength falls on the vacuum that contain
atoms, that vacuum is distorted when electromagnetic properties of the vacuum
are changed. This disrupts those atoms in many ways including how pions are
formed from the vacuum between protons and neutron; how the strong force
behaves inside the proton and neutron and how electrons obit the nucleus.
