https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tkplPbd2f60
On Saturday, November 21, 2015, Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: > Axil, welcome to my limb, great company but hope we don’t fall :_) When > you said [snip] This experiment can provide a time comparison profile of > how the flow of time is increased by positive vacuum energy as a function > of distance traveled by the LENR reaction products from the zero point of > the reaction.[/snip] IMHO your “function” is of Lorentzian type and the > fabric of space itself becomes transforming medium that changes the > radiations into a safe thermal energy source [traveling distance we can’t > see from our perspective and encountering time dilation along the way > “back” to our inertial frame in the “unsuppressed” macro world. In replying > to your email I start to wonder if I too am attributing too much to the > standard velocity derived Lorentzian properties of dilation and contraction > that accumulate so slowly at our near stationary end of the spectrum wrt C > while a Lorentzian effect produced by suppression might side step this > inefficient Pythagorean relationship entirely – It still has to subtract > from the square law/isotropy that dominates gravity in the surrounding > macro world but as the geometry gets more and more radical it may trump the > isotropy to the point where it becomes negligible and positive/negative > vacuum energy segregation varies the relativistic factor within these > regions wildly with even the slightest motion of gas atoms in any direction > wrt surrounding geometry – I have said this before but if these regions are > really relativistic then the possibility of nested regions becomes possible > and recent threads on single ions being catalysts could be the things Mills > spoke of WRT self catalyzing hydrinos. All the pcs fit if Casimir effect > and catalytic action are interpreted as relativistic artifacts due to > suppression including patents / claims of anomalous decay rates. > > Fran > > > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','janap...@gmail.com');>] > *Sent:* Friday, November 20, 2015 2:56 PM > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','vortex-l@eskimo.com');>> > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:An experiment by Klimov > > > > newinflow.ru/pdf/Klimov_Poster.pdf > > Regarding: > > > Heterogeneous plasmoid behind PVR nozzle is γ-radioactive. Soft > X-radiation 100 ÷ 10000 eV from this plasmoid. X-radiation decrement is > very small (radiation intensity decrease is about 20% at L = 100 cm). > > > > This experiment shows that the thermalization of gamma radiation from > nuclear activity from this LENR system is not instantaneous but still very > fact. > > This experiment can provide a time comparison profile of how the flow of > time is increased by positive vacuum energy as a function of distance > traveled by the LENR reaction products from the zero point of the reaction. > > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','eric.wal...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:16 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dlrober...@aol.com');>> wrote: > > > > You mention that gamma radiation is thermalized in some common manner. I > still find it difficult to believe that any high energy gammas are > generated during these reactions. How would all of these be captured? > > > > For this reason it seems unlikely that gammas ever form in the first > place. Instead one might suspect their formation is efficiently > short-circuited by another, faster channel, that is available only in a > closed-in environment, in contrast to the open environment of a plasma. My > own favorite possibility: the energy that would normally be emitted as a > gamma photon is instead dumped into one or more nearby electrons, which are > stopped in the material or gas, causing low-energy atomic transitions which > gradually radiate away the energy imparted by the electrons as they come to > a stop. > > > > Eric > > > > >
