http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0801/0801.2752.pdf
Here is the math support for the “Mössbauer Effect”. It shows that a monopole magnetic field is the most sensitive element to the Mössbauer effect. >From the Urutskoiev exploding titanium foil experiment experiment 4) Various difficulties of interpretation gradually led Urutskoiev and his research team to the conclusion that magnetic poles could be a possible source of the strange radiation effects they had observed. They became aware of the present author’s work and a fruitful collaboration has been initiated. >From the very beginning, an important experiment was realized by Urutskoiev and Ivoilov [54], using the fact that 57Fe is at the same time magnetic and the most sensitive element to the Mössbauer effect. They irradiated, at some meters from the source of the supposed monopoles, a sample of 57Fe . Behind the iron sample was one pole of a long linear magnet, in order to repel the monopoles of the same sign and attract the monopoles of the opposite sign. Owing to the Mössbauer effect, they found a distinct shift of a characteristic γ ray. They repeated the experiment with the other pole of the magnet behind the iron sample and, with the same exposure they found a γ ray shift in the opposite direction [54]. One can make two remarks about this experiment : a) This is one of the most brilliant proof of monopole magnetism. But there are others : for instance, the fact that Ivoilov focused a monopole beam with an electromagnet. b) If the 57Fe target sample used in the Mössbauer experiment is abandoned for three days, the preceding characteristic γ ray spectrum goes back to its mean normal position. This half-life effect seems to hold for all the effects of magnetism induced by monopoles: they seem to have a limited time of life (not predicted by theory). But other effects, such isotopic shifts are definitive. >From this experimental result, the half life of SPP monopole magnetism is three days. 54. N. Ivoilov & L. Urutskoiev, The influence of « strange » radiation on Mössbauer spectrum of F57 in metallic foils, Rus. Applied Physics, N° 5, 2004 (in Russian). http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-297/aflb297m331.pdf On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is uncertain to how large a magnetic effect that SPPs can produce. The > DGT reports from Dr. Kim indicate that the effect can be large, > > *Magnetic monopole beam * > > One of the amazing revelations that has come out of nanoplasmonic research > and experimentation is the explanation of how the “dark mode” polariton > soliton can produce a monopole magnetic beam. This amazing revelation is > not theory; it is based on experimental results. But there is a theoretical > explanation that goes along with the experimental data (10). The monopole > magnetic beam becomes pronounced at polariton soliton (PS) intermediate > energy levels since the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) aligns all the > spins of the polaritons inside the soliton to project out of the soliton > from its center perpendicular to its direction of wave rotation. > > The polariton has a spin of 2. The number of polaritons that can be > absorbed into the soliton is not limited by the Pauli exclusion principle. > There is even an experimental micrograph that shows the soliton and the > monopole beam coming out of it. > > > > This beam can project out to 100 microns away from the soliton. > > > > It is not only the spin of the polaritons that contribute to the power of > the monopole beam but it is also the angular momentum of polariton rotation > that multiplies the magnetic power of the beam. The vortex rotation rate > acts like a train of gears where the microparticle (large gear) drives the > angular momentum of the hydrogen Rydberg matter (small gear). > > > > In the most dramatic case, the 100 micron particle transfers angular > momentum to a hydrogen Rydberg matter particle which is comprised of a > large number of graphite like layered hexagonal disk assemblages with a > diameter just a few atoms across. > > > > Each atomic layer receives angular momentum from the vortex on the surface > of the micro particle and that vortex motion is transferred to the small > atomic hexagonal disks comprising the Rydberg matter. The spin multiplier > that comprises the monopole beam is proportional to the ratio between the > circumference of the 100 micron particle to the circumference of the > hydrogen Rydberg matter hexagonal disk. > > > > The monopole magnetic beam is a primary mechanism of catalytic action in > LENR. The beam can reach out without being depleted and disrupt an > indeterminate number of atomic sites. The experiments of J,C.Fisher can be > explained by the action of this beam. > > markfisher.net/johnfisher/papers/Bigshower.pdfEnergetic > <http://www.markfisher.net/johnfisher/papers/Bigshower.pdfEnergetic> particle > shower in the vapor from electrolysis > > This experiment informs us about the nature of the NAE. The experiment > related in this article uses CR-39 particle detectors to show the > production of energetic particles in the mobile NAE afloat in the vapor > above an electrolytic LENR cell. This NAE has become mobile after it has > become detached from its point of creation somewhere on the lattice of the > electrodes within the cell as it moves upward in the vapor produced by the > action of electrolysis and the heat that this electrode produces. This NAE > produces hundreds of thousands of charged particles as it floats upward out > of the cell. This reaction most probably produces alpha particles as the > NAE raises on the vapor currents upward out of the cell. The analysis in > the article finds that this NAE is a point source of these alpha particles > by correlating the angles of the pits produced by the charged particles as > the NAE rises. This behavior implies that the NAE supports a continuous and > long lasting LENR process that proceeds over a considerable duration of > time. This mobile type of NAE must decouple from its point of creation on > the lattice of the electrode and floats on air currents like a particle of > dust. The mesoscopic NAE must be massive in size to be so driven by > molecules of air and water vapor. In this experiment, the monopole beam > projects out of the center of the mobile soliton up to 100 microns as it > floats upward. The mobile SPP soliton can produce LENR reactions at a > distance or it can enter the CR-39 detector strips and initiate LENR > reactions inside the structure of the detectors as John Fisher has reported > in his experiments. > > 10 - Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic > monopoles > arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> *From:* Axil Axil >> >> *http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf* >> <http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf> >> >> Ø This article shows how a strong magnetic field destroys color in >> matter to produce mesons. >> >> Although this paper is about the extreme magnetic fields (10^15 T) of heavy >> ions in a very hot plasma, there could be relevance to what we are >> talking about in much colder conditions … surprisingly… this is because >> the orbital size of dense deuterium is reduced to a few picometers (2.3 >> pm) according to Holmlid. >> >> We can assume that inverse square applies, no? At the Bohr radius (53 pm) >> , the electron of a deuteron supplies a field of 12.5 Tesla. When the >> orbital is reduced by a factor of 24, this would put the effective field very >> high but less … but certainly QCD should be affected. There is even an >> argument that inverse square goes to inverse cube at picometers…. >> > >
