Rossi has said that he has 64 more patents to submit. The patent that he how has is relevant to the Hot Cat which is not capable of SSM. The 1 MW E-Cat is where SSM applies, It has yet to be patented in whole or in part.
Rossi has said that the E-Cat X which is the updated Hot Cat might be capable of SSM but Rossi has not gotten down to that level of R&D yet with the E-Cat X.. On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:13 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > But Axil, Rossi's patent does not show any such cat and mouse structure. > He has answered a question of mine about the structure of the new CAT by > telling me that the patent is where to look. > > I suspect that you are attempting to make the design fall into a pattern > that you believe is required instead of following the actual data. > > Each tiger probably contains 16 smaller identical units. Perhaps Rossi > has modified the coolant flow so that it is more effective in balancing the > thermal load than with the earlier system. With only 3 modules per > active unit there were far too many pumps, etc. to deal with. Now, he > reduces that requirement by a factor of roughly 5. > > Rossi seems to be wise to keep 4 main tigers together so that if 1 fails, > the other 3 can likely be adjusted to take up that slack for a short period > until the repairs are completed. It may be as simple as that. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Wed, Dec 2, 2015 3:11 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR reactors need magnetic confinement > > Rossi has provided a comprehensive explanation of the Cat and Mouse > reactor clustering method in bits and pieces throughout his Q&A blog. One > of them explains how the shutdown of power from the Mouse causes the Cat to > be stimulated. > > I now take this to mean that when Rossi shuts off a magnetic confinements > field coil that keeps the ENP inside the mouse, the Cats take off because > the ENPs can then get into the Cats to stimulate the LENR reaction. > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:46 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > >> I have also seen the reference to the 16 reactors. The question is >> whether or not 1 is the driver with 15 following devices. Where did you >> see anything about a special type of driver device among the other 15? Did >> Rossi state this or is it entirely your assumption? >> >> Dave >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Wed, Dec 2, 2015 2:12 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR reactors need magnetic confinement >> >> Roland Bob >> <http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/12/01/rossi-on-the-e-cats-modular-future-e-cat-x-units-can-combine-to-make-power-plants-of-any-size/#comment-2387524176> >> • 17 hours ago >> <http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/12/01/rossi-on-the-e-cats-modular-future-e-cat-x-units-can-combine-to-make-power-plants-of-any-size/#comment-2388142662> >> Hi Bob, >> Each 250kVA module is composed of 16 reactors; we were all confused about >> this till Rossi revealed the structure a few days ago after the photos and >> mockups were published. >> >> From: >> Rossi on the E-Cat’s Modular Future: E-Cat X Units Can Combine to Make >> Power Plants of Any Size >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:42 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Axil, where did you see a description of the tiger? I do not recall >>> any reference to the use of one module to drive the other 15. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>> Sent: Tue, Dec 1, 2015 10:40 pm >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR reactors need magnetic confinement >>> >>> It has be recently revealed that each 250kVA E-Cat tiger reactor module >>> is composed of 16 reactors. Only one of those reactors is a powered >>> activator(mouse). The other 15 are drones driven by the activator. The >>> activator produces a reaction catalyst that drives the other drones. I say >>> that the reaction catalyst is the magnetic Exotic Neutral Particle(ENP) >>> that becomes mobile as its energy content level reaches a self sustaining >>> threshold. At low temperatures the alumina tub reactor shell that all these >>> reactors are comprised of confines the ENP. But as all these reactors heat >>> up, the alumina shell becomes electrically conductive. At high >>> temperatures, the alumina becomes magnetically transparent and this allows >>> the ENP to leave the activator an enter the drone where the ENP catalyzes >>> the LENR reaction. >>> >>> http://www.thevalvepage.com/valvetek/heater/fig1.gif >>> >>> Electrical conductivity Vs, temperature. >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The so called Erzion phenomenon was discovered in a series of >>>> electrolytic experiments marked by unexplained changes in a pool of cooling >>>> water outside of the catalytic cell. After 40 minutes of electrolytic cell >>>> operation, water on the tungsten anode side of the cooling vessel started >>>> loosing its transparency. >>>> Water on the stainless steel cathode of the pool of cooling water >>>> remained transparent, at the same 40 C temperature. A sample of bubbly >>>> water, removed from the anode side, was tested for induced gamma >>>> radioactivity. No such radioactivity was found in it; the sample became >>>> transparent after 24 hours. Attempts to reproduce the long-term loss of >>>> cooling water transparency with other electrolytes, and under different >>>> electrical discharge conditions, were not successful. But the effect was >>>> highly reproducible when experimenting with the tungsten-anode electrolytic >>>> cell and the 7 M KF electrolyte containing 50% of heavy water. >>>> [image: Thumbnail] >>>> <http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/341fig1.jpg> >>>> That cooling water on the outside of the electrolytic cell's glass >>>> reactor shell at the right side (see Figure 1) is close to the anode while >>>> cooling water on the left side is close to the cathode. The disappearance >>>> of bubbles, after the electrolysis, was very slow (half-life of about 10 >>>> hrs). Attempts to explain the phenomenon in terms of cavitation, and other >>>> ultrasonic effects, were not successful. The only satisfactory explanation >>>> was possible within the framework of the erzion model. Authors believe that >>>> bubbles are produced through the action of neutral Erzions. >>>> The Erzons phenomenon behavior is consistent with the magnetic based >>>> Exotic Neutral Particle(ENP). To begin with, the glass container is >>>> transparent to the magnetically based ENPs both optically and magnetically. >>>> The LENR reaction that keeps the ENPs viable produce the vapor that forms >>>> the water bubbles. The ENPs become energetically self sufficient in the >>>> water of the cooling pool where the ENPs remain viable for hours. >>>> If the Erzons phenomenon is produced by magnetically based ENPs, an >>>> iron plate placed just on the outside of the glass wall adjacent to the >>>> anode would prevent the ENPs from exiting the glass electrolytic cell. With >>>> the ENPs blocked from travel, bubble production would be eliminated. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In my opinion, the fundamental nature of the Rossi effect is based on >>>>> magnetism. The catalytic particle that produces the reaction is magnetic >>>>> in >>>>> nature. This particle is produced by heat pumping and EMF stimulation. The >>>>> nature of this Exotic Neutral Particle (ENP)is reflected by the behaviour >>>>> of the E-Cat itself and reflect how the E-Cat operates. >>>>> >>>>> The ENP can exist at low energy pumping where the energy coming into >>>>> the particle is equal to the energy leaving the particle. This is similar >>>>> to the way Rossi keeps his reactor under control. Too much external energy >>>>> pumping will result in the E-Cat going critical. >>>>> >>>>> The same process of over pumping happens with the ENP. Overpumping >>>>> brings it to the stage where it becomes self-sufficient requiring no >>>>> additional EMF input. The energized ENP can get EMF from the environment >>>>> around it not requiring external heat or EMF simulation to be applied. >>>>> >>>>> The same is true for the E-Cat. When the E-Cat is subcritical, it >>>>> requires heat and EMF stimulation to be applied. But when it is "over >>>>> stimulated" it begins to meltdown since it has become independent from >>>>> externally applied stimulation. >>>>> >>>>> The ENP can live as long as it can catalyze energy production from the >>>>> material around it. The ENP can live for days on its own as it brings in >>>>> energy from the environment to sustain its internal LENR reaction >>>>> processes. >>>>> >>>>> Magnetic confinement increases efficiency of the reaction. Such >>>>> confinement saves the externally applied energy that produced the ENP from >>>>> being wasted. >>>>> >>>>> The ENP can leave the reactor if the material that makes up the >>>>> reactor enclosure is transparent to the optical and magnetic nature of the >>>>> ENP. This might be why electrolytic cells have difficulty in sustaining >>>>> powerful LENR reactions. In this case, the ENPs escape the glass beaker >>>>> reactor enclosure and all the input energy that was pumped into the ENP is >>>>> wasted to the environment. outside the electrolytic cell. >>>>> >>>>> If the cell is made of material that can contain the ENP both >>>>> optically and magnetically, the reactor will be efficent. Alumina is >>>>> antiferromagnetic and will confine magnetic particles thy to escape the >>>>> reactor shell. Another method of ENP confinement that Rossi might use is a >>>>> solenoidal confinement coil that keeps the ENPs away from the reactor >>>>> walls >>>>> in the center axis of the reactor. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
