I think those claims are what we have been waiting for. (some of you guys actively for 25 years). It cannot be right to say it is not serious. I agree that there is no proof before it is in the market or scientifically explained / tested. However, you must not disbelieve a final and good outcome. I think it is trilling and fascinating and can hardly wait until I can see the next chapter. If he can produce electricity why is a jet engine implausible? Even if it is not engineered or cannot produce trust in comparison with the common fossil fueled jet engine - I can understand that it is tempting to make such experiment. It certainly would be a very lucrative market and AR and IH could easily get much needed funding for further investments (building a robot factory for example). If he can get market dominance for a few years he can put in place a business method that favors his product. I doubt that minimal fuel packages is a good idea but perhaps the Sony idea (if it is not built by Sony it is not compatible - maybe an old situation when Sony where dominating laptops). In short there is finally lots of good news. They are not spoken with openings for to return with explanations that gives any reasons to doubt the statements to be both true and serious. I am admiring AR for putting all his goodwill on the line. A nonperformance would ruin his credibility. Unfortunately it would also make LENR obsolete for another 25 years. I think we need to support the home team.:)
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros [email protected] +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > I gather this is with regard to Rossi's claims. I do not take his claims > seriously. I think they are more stream-of-consciousness than lies. > > Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Whopper of the Week >> >> 1) 140 patents in progress >> > How do you know this is not true? There is a lot of money behind Rossi. > "In progress" can mean a lot of things. It could mean people are drafting > patents (which does not cost much), or it could mean patents they have > actually been filed (which costs a lot). > > >> 2) Direct electricity or heat – either one or both >> >> 3) Jet engine application >> > Implausible at best. > > >> 4) Fully Robotic factory to make fuel wafers >> > Is he saying there is such a factory? Or that they are planning one. I am > pretty sure there is no factory at present. > > >> 5) Reactor hotter on outside than inside >> > He says this is because of EM fields. That is plausible. It is not a > violation of any law. The sun is hotter on the outside corona layer than > the inside. > > >> 6) No fuel module replaced in last 300 days >> > That's entirely likely. I see no reason to doubt this. Any cold fusion > device should be able to run that long. When the technology matures, they > should go for years. > > The only surprising thing about this is how short the duration is. I > suspect they may be engineering the thing to need a new fuel module as > often as possible. In the old days we would say they are hoping to sell the > razor at cost and then make money selling the blades. Nowadays it would be > selling the printer at cost and then profiting on the ink cartridges. > > - Jed > >
