Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> Will the patent office allow such a patent that cannot explain how energy
> is produced?
>

Yes, it will. David French and many other experts have told me this, and
this is also how I read the P.O. rules. Many discoveries without
theoretical explanations have been patented.

Not only is this allowed, but French and other experts say you should leave
out all mention of theory in your patent, even if you have a theory. If you
include a theory, and it turns out to be wrong, the patent may be ruled
invalid. Whereas if the patent does not include your theory, it makes no
difference whether the theory is right or wrong. As a rule, you should not
include anything in the patent other than what the Patent Office says you
must include. Anything extra may weaken the patent, and will not make it
stronger.

The only thing you must include in a patent is a description that will
allow a PHOSITA (person having ordinary skill in the art) to replicate. A
PHOSITA can replicate without knowing a theory.

- Jed

Reply via email to