I think you should repeat the example of the Wright brothers until someone's head or hands explode.
2015-12-28 18:38 GMT-02:00 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>: > > That is for the patent office examiner to decide. If he or she agrees with > you that this claim is crazy, that will be grounds to reject the patent > application. > > This illustrates why it is better to leave out all theoretical claims. If > Rossi never says "the heat source is a catalyst" they cannot reject the > application on that basis. Since a PHOSITA can replicate without that > information (?), there is no benefit to including it. > > - Jed > > >
