The strong force for could be based on monopole magnetism. Monopole magnetism does not follow the inverse square law of spherical propagation.
This is consistent with the way the strong force does not weaken as the distance between the quarks are increased. Another similarity between non perturbative quantum chromodynamics and monopole magnetism is that both are described by non associative mechanics where the wave function cannot be applied since the forces involved are linear. http://phys.org/news/2015-12-physicists-unusual-quantum-mechanics.html On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:51 PM, H Ucar <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil wrote: > > "Why should the quark be any different than the electron. The quark must > also be a toroid made out of a knotted photon with fractional charge > connected to its anti particle by a monopole field." > > > > See Barut article at > https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=P4jkBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA344&lpg=PA344&dq=a.o.+barut+lepton > +and+quarks&source=bl&ots=j-RawR3zV7&sig=ve1Tu2arEQK2OLzjuGWm4vfTQe8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiFvYHpr7vKAhXDJA8KHfP1DIIQ6AEISjAN#v=onepage&q&f=true > <https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=P4jkBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA344&lpg=PA344&dq=a.o.+barut+lepton+and+quarks&source=bl&ots=j-RawR3zV7&sig=ve1Tu2arEQK2OLzjuGWm4vfTQe8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiFvYHpr7vKAhXDJA8KHfP1DIIQ6AEISjAN#v=onepage&q&f=true> > > > Barut suggested quarks could merely electrons and bound together (and > neutinos) with very strong magnetic forces. > > > He wrote "We see that magnetic interactions at short distance have a very > rich structure, manifestations like 'strong interactions', like the rich > structure of particle physics itself." > > > I demonstrated that spinning dipole magnets get bounded in very rich > oscillation modes, the key is magnetic dipole moments are not fixed in one > direction but have angula r oscillations. >
