My expectation is that they're applying anomolous voltage, since all previous versions of Orbo depended upon tricking magnetic force into performing free work, and they're claiming that the current tech works in fundamentally the same way.
I've had no contact with them since the SKDB closed, but have personally validated their permanent magnet and solenoid-based systems (along with multiple more qualified experts). In both cases, the input workload is either substantially or wholly attenuated, while harnessing a full and uncompromised output workload - analogous to dropping a mass when it's heavy and picking it up when it's light. The permanent magnet tech exploited slow rise times of induced B for a given H, akin to climbing the stairs on a kid's slide while gravity's still getting its act together, then sliding down under its full influence. The e-Orbo is an effective N3 violation, causing concurrent equal and opposite back EMFs to mutually self-cancel, resulting in a Lenzless motor - the rotor attracts to the deactivated stator solenoid driven only by the rotor-mounted passive permanent magnets, then coasts away from the active stator solenoid under zero force (ie. not interacting with it at all). Hence the input workload is resistance heating, which is inherently decoupled from and incidental to the entirely passive output workload of accelerating the rotor. As such, rotor KE evolves following the usual half-square of angular inertia times angular velocity, while input energy sums linearly per cycle, hence there's a threshold RPM beyond which output < input. So while i've considered interpretations that would invoke free electrons from nowhere, i think free EMF of some kind is the more consistent likelihood. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: > It appears from the Steorn video description pointed to by Jones below > that the the "power packs" behave as an unusual capacitor. The device > appears to have separate charge and discharge modes. In charge mode the > capacitor-like "power-packs" are "charged" from a high voltage source (2x9V > battery with series 1Mohm resistor). While charging, the capacitance > appears to be very low, call it Cc, and it doesn't take much Coulombic > charge (not many electrons) to reach a voltage of, say 5V. Then the > capacitor-like "power pack" is switched to a load. In discharge, the > capacitance, Cd, appears to be much higher than Cc, allowing more Coulombic > charge (more electrons) to be taken out before the device reaches its > minimum discharge voltage. This is a quite unusual [classically impossible > over-unity] device, which still may be related to an electret. It appears > that the capacitor-like "power pack" elements are of "jelly roll" > construction due to their cylindrical form factor. > > If the "power pack" devices truly work in this fashion, I can easily see > how over-unity energy is delivered. > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Prototypes have been shown. Not sure of current status as there were >> legal disputes involved. Eye witnesses under NDA have seen it producing >> electrical power. There is a chance that “something like this” is >> involved in the Steorn device (to the extent that either device actually >> works over an extended period) but I doubt it - since Steorn doesn’t seem >> to work, firstly - and secondly doesn’t have a magnetic field. Here is >> an update: >> >> >> *http://dispatchesfromthefuture.com/2016/02/new-video-reveals-ocube-components-describes-problems/* >> <http://dispatchesfromthefuture.com/2016/02/new-video-reveals-ocube-components-describes-problems/> >> >> >
