The normal expectation of re-emission might not be happening in LENR. Holmlid produces many billions of high speed neutral particle fragments per laser shot whose speed is a goodly fraction of the speed of light. And yet, Holmlid is still alive. The gamma radiation that should be produced when these high speed particles hit the structure of the test bed does not appear. The distance that these particles fly is very far from the point of creation. The gamma damping mechanism has a very long reach,
Some sort of BEC shield must be thermalizing the gammas produces by the high speed neutral particles. This strange mechanism might be used in space to protect astronauts from cosmic rays. Holmlid;s convection that he is producing hot fusion does not fit with the lack of gamma that are seen in his tests. On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Russ George <[email protected]> wrote: > What about a secondary muon target re-emitter… what would the ideal target > and emission be? > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Sunday, February 21, 2016 12:38 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner > > > > From the top of my head, a cloud chamber... > > > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Russ George <[email protected]> > wrote: > > What might be a variety of means, low tech to high tech, to detect low > energy muons? > > > > *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Sunday, February 21, 2016 12:19 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner > > > > The deflation hypothesis of Horace Heffner is still of significant > interest - but seldom discussed. Here is the paper > > http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/DeflationFusion2.pdf > > There is a new twist which is possible to consider on this hypothesis since > it was last updated. (The following suggestion is independent of Horace but > borrows his concept relating to collapse of the wave function of an > electron). That deflated electron in question is now to be identified as > the electron of UDD (Rydberg matter) after irradiation by a laser and SPP > compression. > > In the context of Holmlid, then - it is possible to reconsider the > collapsing wave function as something other than part of a helium fusion > event. The alternative event is simpler and would involving the electron > collapsing into the proton (of a deuteron) which has been triggered by > laser interaction with the electron. The interaction of three particles > in the nucleus (neutron, proton and deflated electron) has the surprising > QCD result of nucleon disintegration (as opposed to fusion). > > The observable outcome, as documented by Holmlid - would be muons, which > are detected when they decay elsewhere than the reactor (as they are > weakly interacting and decay meters away). Far greater initial excess energy > is involved - but it dissipates mostly as neutrinos, so less local energy > is seen in the reactor. > > The details remain to be worked out but we would not expect to see massive > excess-heat locally. Instead we should see a spatial signal which is > evident some distance away from the reactor – which is muon decay into > neutrinos and electrons. This muon decay signature is easily detectable > but prior to Holmlid, no one thought to look for it. > > Jones > > >
