Yes, dig up that old aquarium in the garage or attic and get some dry ice. Here 
is a design that uses Peltiers

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqM4CsM4ewI

 

 

 

From: Axil Axil 

 

>From the top of my head, a cloud chamber...

 

Russ George wrote:

What might be a variety of means, low tech to high tech, to detect low energy 
muons?

 

From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 12:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner

 

The deflation hypothesis of Horace Heffner is still of significant interest - 
but seldom discussed. Here is the paper

 <http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/DeflationFusion2.pdf> 
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/DeflationFusion2.pdf

There is a new twist which is possible to consider on this hypothesis since it 
was last updated. (The following suggestion is independent of Horace but 
borrows his concept relating to collapse of the wave function of an electron). 
That deflated electron in question is now to be identified as the electron of 
UDD (Rydberg matter) after irradiation by a laser and SPP compression.

In the context of Holmlid, then - it is possible to reconsider the collapsing 
wave function as something other than part of a helium fusion event. The 
alternative event is simpler and would involving the electron collapsing into 
the proton (of a deuteron) which has been triggered by laser interaction with 
the electron. The interaction of three particles in the nucleus (neutron, 
proton and deflated electron) has the surprising QCD result of nucleon 
disintegration (as opposed to fusion). 

The observable outcome, as documented by Holmlid - would be muons, which are 
detected when they decay elsewhere than the reactor (as they are weakly 
interacting and decay meters away). Far greater initial excess energy is 
involved - but it dissipates mostly as neutrinos, so less local energy is seen 
in the reactor. 

The details remain to be worked out but we would not expect to see massive 
excess-heat locally. Instead we should see a spatial signal which is evident 
some distance away from the reactor – which is muon decay into neutrinos and 
electrons. This muon decay signature is easily detectable but prior to Holmlid, 
no one thought to look for it.

Jones

 

Reply via email to