Bob made an interesting video but I believe that his thoughts about melted lead surrounding the active cells are incorrect. It is much more likely that these core cells are operating at a very high external temperature of over 1000 C and radiation to a low temperature surface is the main escape path for the generated heat.
Rossi has stated that the actual temperature of the output heated water/steam is highly variable. This is easy to achieve if radiation is the main thermal path. The surface that collects that radiation can then conduct it to the water where the temperature of the cooling water is established by adjusting its flow rate. If you desire a higher coolant temperature you would slow down its flow rate so that more heat is absorbed per kilogram during its pass through the system. Also, having radiation as the main heat flow path from the core allows Rossi to use much less activation heating power. If a lead conductor such as that discussed were used then far more heat would be needed in order to raise the temperature of the active cells. That is counter to achieving a good COP. All of my models support what I am proposing and I have pointed it out several times on this site in the past. One glance at Parkhomov's experimentation and results clearly show that he achieved the most gain and instability(associated with too much positive feedback) when he covered the system with an insulating or reflecting material. Dave -----Original Message----- From: H LV <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, Feb 27, 2016 7:50 pm Subject: [Vo]:Bremsstrahlung radiation Mathieu Valat of MFMP made this comment on the youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtTeHU4vBmc Mathieu Valat14 hours ago Bob gave a lot of himself in the last week. Big cheers up for this video! For the record, my friends are retired nuclear scientists. What they hypothesised is Bremsstrahlung radiation, right of the bat. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremsstrahlung Harry
