On Jan 10, 2006, at 11:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Thanks! Good food must be digested slowly. But, one question, you said single protons or deuterons don't fit in the Pd lattice. The Pd lattice is fcc with a unit cell dimension of 389.1 pm.

Interesting. I have a bond length for Pd of 275.11 pm. This is not consistent with a cell size of 389.1 pm. If you have better lattice data for the table below I would very much like to see it.


Pd atomic radius is 137 pm.

I have 179 pm atomic radius, and 128 pm covalent radius in my Sargent- Welch periodic table. I'm pretty sure I used the covalent radius in the calculations for the size ball that would fit in the face hole and tetrahedral space, so this gives more space (a smaller intruding bulge) than your numbers, and your unit cell dimension implies a longer bond length than I used, so that implies more space as well. It would indeed be nice to get the best available data for all this.


With a Bohr radius of 0.529 pm, the hydrogen atom


My periodic table shows the H covalent radius to be 0.32 angstroms, i.e. 32 pm, and the H radius to be 0.79 angstroms, 79 pm. Even 0.529 angstroms sounds way off, unless the H is in partial orbital state.


certainly squeezes in interstitially; or, am I missing something? Forgive me if the answer is in the paper cited.

For some reason we have very different data. Mine could certainly be wrong. I did not use the most reliable and current source. Unfortunately I don't recall offhand where I got the bond length data I used in the AEH paper. I'll have to dig around and don't have the time at the moment. Unfortunately I threw out the drawing and original paper and pencil calculations, and have upgraded computers since. Below is the table I computed, as cut and pasted from the AEH article.


Elem.   Bond   Covalent Atomic  Face Hole   Tetrahedral
        Length  Radius  Radius  Radius      Space Radius
         (A)      (A)    (A)     (A)           (A)
Ge      2.4498   1.22   1.52    0.1944        0.5123
Pt      2.7460   1.30   1.83    0.2854        0.6417
Ni      2.4916   1.15   1.62    0.2885        0.6118
Cu      2.5560   1.17   1.57    0.3057        0.6373
Pd      2.7511   1.28   1.79    0.3083        0.6653
Au      2.8841   1.34   1.79    0.3251        0.6993
Ag      2.8894   1.34   1.75    0.3282        0.7031
Al      2.8630   1.25   1.82    0.4030        0.7744
Ce      3.6500   1.65   2.70    0.4573        0.9309
Yb      3.8800   1.74   2.40    0.5001        1.0035
Ca      3.9470   1.74   2.23    0.5388        1.0509
Pb      3.5003   1.47   1.81    0.5509        1.0051
Sr      4.3020   1.91   2.45    0.5738        1.1319

I simply looked at the geometry as if the atoms were little balls.

I believe I've read a fairly recent article somewhere where neutron scattering data confirmed the partial orbital state of single hydrogen atoms in a loaded Pd lattice. I don't recall where. My memory is just not very good.

It does seem to me that if your data shown above is assumed then there is no way to account for the lattice swelling that occurs prior to full loading, and it would be difficult to account for diffusion rate observations. The hydrogen would go through the lattice like food through a goose.

It would be good to find some reliable data.

Horace Heffner


Reply via email to