Are you saying ‘why doesn’t this experimentalist do his experiment your way?’ 
That’s a bit presumptuous, clearly this guy has put in a lot of effort and 
diligence. His results are consistent with what other diligent experimentalists 
in the field have presented, faithfully matching their experiments though in a 
remarkably simple form. Noone of those others have done what you suggest and 
they seem to be very learned and well equipped and could have done so. The rule 
used to be in science that those with ‘good ideas’ were expected to contribute 
more than the ‘idea’ and do the work as well lest they be simply considered 
gadflies. The dire proliferation of the ‘skeptic’ point of view in science is 
the result of the rampant university puppy mills that have turned out legions 
of people with learning and no place to use it save in virtual realities.

 

The tiny wires and geometry that power the magnetron in the aforementioned 
experiment don’t appear to offer any support to a notion that some sort of 
thrust between the wires is possible… you might of course replicate the 
experiment with just the wires you speak of (leave out all the complex bits) 
and report on being able to produce a facsimile of the thrust reported by the 
differential in the wires push and pull.

 

From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 12:57 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

 

I would love to see a real EM Drive but it is impossible to believe an 
experiment with external power supply lines attached.   Electric motors operate 
by utilizing the forces that exist between current carrying conductors.  Two 
wires will always push or pull against each other when they carry current and 
this effect must be eliminated in order to prove drive force.

Why does the experimenter not use some form of shielded on board battery for 
power?  A short duration test might be possible especially if they wish to 
convince many skeptics.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Russ George < <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> russ.geo...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l < <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Mon, Mar 14, 2016 3:42 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

Here’s a link to a great EM Drive DIY experiment  
<http://www.masinaelectrica.com/emdrive-independent-test/#comment-10348> 
http://www.masinaelectrica.com/emdrive-independent-test/#comment-10348

 

 

From: David Roberson [ <mailto:dlrober...@aol.com?> mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 12:36 PM
To:  <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

 

I suppose we will have to discover that aether before we can have confidence in 
that possibility.

Would you expect a normal rocket to behave in the same manner if it had to push 
the aether out of its way?   Why would that not require both effects to be 
present thereby changing the reaction mass expelled by the standard rocket?

How would you detect the bow wave or other mass-equivalents to prove they 
exist?  Something must contain the energy that was lost due to operation of the 
drive and it should be measurable.  Then, you will need to modify Special 
Relativity in order to detect the true absolute reference frame of the universe.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jones Beene < <mailto:jone...@pacbell.net> jone...@pacbell.net>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> >
Sent: Mon, Mar 14, 2016 3:20 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

 

Stated another way – does the aether have mass or mass-equivalence (virtual 
mass or effective mass)? 

 

If so, and the EM drive is moving in aether, then leaving a wake (bow wave, 
eddy turbulence, kelvin wake, etc) also leaves a mass-equivalence.

 

 

From: David Roberson 

 

Good argument.  I just wanted to add one thought.

>From the EM drive's point of view the CoE must be violated because as it 
>accelerates in space a portion of it's mass must be converted into energy that 
>is used to power the drive.  When it ceases to use the drive it begins to 
>remain motionless in space from its point of view.   Where did that mass go 
>which was converted into energy that powered the drive?  Did it simply vanish?

 

Reply via email to