If Rossi’s Hot Cat works and produces direct electricity, it may be that that associated IP is not licensed, since it is a separate invention. The key question is did any of the IH team contribute to the Hot Cat direct electricity invention and/or who paid for the ideas. Its not my impression that Rossi as chief scientist of IH was restricted to doing his own thinking and inventing.
It seemed that his invention of the small quark entity he has talked about may have been separate from his function as chief scientist of IH. It would be interesting to know if Rossi was paid as chief scientist at IH. The other question is who owned the separate office/lab that Rossi occupied at the customer’s place where the year long test happened? It seemed the Agreement between Rossi, IH etal did not require Rossi’s assistance in running the low temperature E-Cat for ever. I think he had only a two year period he was on the hook, so to speak. He may have quit as chief scientist once the year long testing was done or before that at the end of the 2 year period. As far as IH is concerned it seems to me that their claiming the IP as their property has no merit, and their formation of different companies to distance IH from the agreement liabilities is suspicious. I wonder what the arrangement with the various Chinese entities is with respect to the sharing of trade secrets of the E-Cat? and/or quark. Paying Rossi $89M may not be enough to correct other wrongs associated with the agreement provisions. I was also happy to see Rossi’s quick action to defend his inventions IP and the associated patents. I doubt his new patents (some 100 or so) per his comments include IH as an inventor. Does anyone know? Bob Cook From: Roarty, Francis X Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 3:53 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:Copy of Rossi's civil complaint Russ, nice assessment – I agree that letting IH back in would be worst case for Rossi but he may have to allow it if they cry honest mistake and immediately make good on the original agreement… Rossi is probably in negotiations already with larger industries that could roll his inventions out much faster if he can disengage himself from IH, Really obliging of Darden et all to release their rights so easily at this time when the IP valuation just soared through the roof. Thank you IH! Fran From: Russ George [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 8:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Copy of Rossi's civil complaint That is a very straight legal case Rossi reveals that points to the failure of IH to honor its contract. Rossi is clearly going to win this unless IH pays up the $89 million. Rossi is in the catbird seat as he is being seen to enforce his IP and license agreements which is a vital task under IP law. The courts usually take a very simple view of such matters if the payments are not made and infringements are shown then Rossi gets ALL his IP back and IH loses any licenses. Since Rossi has now proven his tech works and IH has proven that big money will invest, aka Woodward funds, Rossi will find it simple to raise similar sums. Good for him he has played very cool and straight with IH and it seems clear IH has not done the same. We shall have to see what the courts say but in the meantime Rossi owns it all and can move ahead. Worst case scenario for Rossi is IH pays up to retain the license. Given the obvious leaks that have been out prior to this document saying Rossi and IH were having difficulties someone on the inside has been playing a dark game against Rossi by feeding the trolls. From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 5:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Vo]:Copy of Rossi's civil complaint See: http://www.e-catworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Leonardosuit01-main.pdf
