Andrea Rossi April 6, 2016 at 4:07 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=940&cpage=2#comment-1169322>
Domenico Canino: This time the story goes that “Meucci” has the patent, the industry, the product and whomever will try to compete against us will discover what is there under the tip of the iceberg. Warm Regards A.R. Rossi has discovered many things in his years of constant trial and error. He might have only given IH a bare minimum to get that 11.5 million. He might have held back the Cat/Mouse COP amplifier method. IH might just have been able to produce a COP that a mouse can generate(< 2). When IH saw a COP of 50, IH knew Rossi was not giving IH all his way and means. Brilliouin is not a system that can use Mouse/Cat amplification. So the Rossi IP transfer to Brilliouin had a problem. These two systems were incompatible. The stealing of Rossi IP was plane for Rossi to see but the hold back of that IP by Rossi was not apparent till after the Third party test. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jed wrote: Ridiculous to assert that IH have not acting in good faith - if >> the demo worked they would be the happiest people in the world and would be >> on track to make vast amounts of money . . . > > > That wasn't me, but I agree. > > > >> Suppose IH thought the E-Cat would not meet the test criteria of COP 6 >> (IH were having trouble doing it)? Remember Rossi was using s different >> version, the 250kW modules. If the test failed, having the IP they could >> then go on developing it themselves. They are building a new lab. >> > > Surely they would have to pay royalties in that case. I expect they would > end up paying a lot more than $89 million if the technology succeeds in the > marketplace. > > $89 million is a very reasonable sum if the technology works, even if it > needs more development. Actually, that is dirt cheap. It is only too much > to pay if, as I.H. claims, they have not been able to "substantiate" it. > > ("Substantiate" could mean a lot of things, I suppose.) > > - Jed > >
