Russ George <[email protected]> wrote:

You and I agree there is no data from the demo under discussion! So all of
> the chatter about whether Rossi does good or bad work is preposterous
> untimely speculation.
>

Rossi has REPEATEDLY done dreadful work. I have followed his work as
closely as anyone. I met with many people who visited him and worked with
him, such as the people from NASA, and Mat Lewan. I corresponded with Rossi
extensively. I have photos and unpublished data from him, and from people
who worked with him. I know a lot about his work, and his techniques. In my
judgement, and in the judgement of the people at NASA and others, he has
often done terribly sloppy work. He made gross errors. He tends to blow up
when people show him he is making a mistake, for example, when the people
from NASA showed him the reactor outlet was plugged up and the flow rate
was zero. He threw them out.

He is his own worst enemy.

He has also made many contradictory technical claims. I compiled a list and
uploaded it here again recently.

Everyone has faults, but Rossi's faults are extravagant -- larger than
life. They are readily apparent to everyone I know who has worked with him,
and I know lots of people who have worked with him.



> That’s NOT science that is school yard rude behavior.
>

I disagree. I think that a researcher who acts this way should be held
accountable.


>

> As for data on Rossi’s acumen as a smart businessman the data in his legal
> paperwork is clearly demonstrable of his great capability.
>

His lawyer wrote that. I guess he knows how to hire a good lawyer.



> His recent note in response to IH is more solid data on Rossi’s command of
> business and science.
>

That will depend on who is right about the Penon report. If the report
shows convincing evidence of excess heat, Rossi will vindicated and he will
be shown to have command of business and science. If the report shows no
evidence of excess heat, I.H. will be vindicated. If the report is
ambiguous, like the Lugano report, we will all have to decide for ourselves.

- Jed

Reply via email to